Paul J. Quirk
- Political Science and International Relations top 0.2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Communication top 0.5%
- Strategy and Management top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Co-authors
- James H. KuklinskiMartha DerthickBrian J. GainesRobert F. RichJennifer JeritDavid SchwiederBuddy PeytonJay Verkuilen
- Topics
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation (19 papers)Social Media and Politics (8 papers)Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers)
- Journals
- American Political Science ReviewAmerican Journal of Political ScienceThe Journal of Politics
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Paul J. Quirk
43 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Political Science and International Relations 1.4k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.3k
- Communication 718
- Strategy and Management 477
- Economics and Econometrics 388
Countries citing papers authored by Paul J. Quirk
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul J. Quirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul J. Quirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul J. Quirk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul J. Quirk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul J. Quirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul J. Quirk. The network helps show where Paul J. Quirk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul J. Quirk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul J. Quirk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul J. Quirk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul J. Quirk. Paul J. Quirk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 32 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | Same Facts, Different Interpretations: Partisan Motivation and Opinion on Iraqbreakdown → | 376 |
| 13 | The legislative branch | 10 |
| 14 | 58 | |
| 15 | Coping with the Politics of Scandal | 5 |
| 16 | 47 | |
| 17 | 114 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Paul J. Quirk
Paul J. Quirk is a scholar working on Public Administration, Communication and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 48 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (19 papers), Social Media and Politics (8 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (718 citations), Public Administration (226 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (1.4k citations). Paul J. Quirk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include James H. Kuklinski, Martha Derthick, Brian J. Gaines, Robert F. Rich, Jennifer Jerit, David Schwieder, Buddy Peyton, Jay Verkuilen, David Martin and Hank Jenkins‐Smith. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science and The Journal of Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.