Paul Forbes

76 total papers · 1.4k total citations
28 papers, 672 citations indexed

About

Paul Forbes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul Forbes has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 672 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 papers in Social Psychology and 9 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Paul Forbes's work include Action Observation and Synchronization (7 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (6 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers). Paul Forbes is often cited by papers focused on Action Observation and Synchronization (7 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (6 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers). Paul Forbes collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and Germany. Paul Forbes's co-authors include Claus Lamm, Antonia F. de C. Hamilton, Jonas P. Nitschke, Patricia Lockwood, Matthew A J Apps, Nida Ali, Jo Cutler, Xueni Pan, Kate Nation and Holly Joseph and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Paul Forbes

28 papers receiving 657 citations

Hit Papers

Resilience during uncerta... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 50 100 150 200

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Paul Forbes 263 221 212 114 110 28 672
Christopher J. Hand 176 0.7× 163 0.7× 261 1.2× 149 1.3× 111 1.0× 34 755
Alain Guerrién 213 0.8× 190 0.9× 133 0.6× 143 1.3× 85 0.8× 35 775
Nadja Heym 187 0.7× 141 0.6× 381 1.8× 190 1.7× 45 0.4× 38 769
Beyon Miloyan 150 0.6× 213 1.0× 201 0.9× 355 3.1× 121 1.1× 24 766
Richard Almond 310 1.2× 95 0.4× 299 1.4× 68 0.6× 39 0.4× 24 788
Jack L. Powell 129 0.5× 130 0.6× 171 0.8× 84 0.7× 141 1.3× 28 653
Alicia Hofelich Mohr 188 0.7× 121 0.5× 119 0.6× 138 1.2× 41 0.4× 26 683
Lee D. Cooper 105 0.4× 139 0.6× 376 1.8× 126 1.1× 68 0.6× 26 603
Pio Enrico Ricci Bitti 227 0.9× 227 1.0× 171 0.8× 229 2.0× 44 0.4× 43 767
Anne-Laure Gilet 248 0.9× 260 1.2× 105 0.5× 223 2.0× 71 0.6× 18 603

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Forbes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Forbes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Forbes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Forbes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Forbes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Forbes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Forbes. The network helps show where Paul Forbes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Forbes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Forbes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Forbes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Forbes. Paul Forbes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026