Paul Desmedt
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Surgery
- Radiation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Graeme PenneyJürgen WeeseDavid J. HawkesDavid HillJohn A. LittleThorsten M. BuzugJuergen WeeseRoland Goecke
- Topics
- Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers)Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (5 papers)Medical Imaging and Analysis (3 papers)
- Journals
- IEEE Transactions on Medical ImagingIEEE Transactions on Information Technology in BiomedicinePubMed
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Paul Desmedt
7 papers receiving 682 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 420
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 369
- Biomedical Engineering 305
- Surgery 104
- Radiation 95
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Desmedt
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Desmedt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Desmedt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Desmedt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Desmedt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Desmedt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Desmedt. The network helps show where Paul Desmedt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Desmedt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Desmedt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Desmedt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Desmedt. Paul Desmedt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 37 | |
| 3 | A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-D-3-D medical image registrationbreakdown → | 546 |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 121 | |
| 6 | On the use of a Multi-threaded Operating System for an efficient Parallel Implementation of the ML-EM Algorithm for PET Image Reconstruction. | 1 |
| 7 | Measured attenuation correction using the Maximum Likelihood algorithm. | 3 |
About Paul Desmedt
Paul Desmedt is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 7 papers that have together received 719 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (5 papers) and Medical Imaging and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (420 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (369 citations) and Radiation (95 citations). Paul Desmedt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Graeme Penney, Jürgen Weese, David J. Hawkes, David Hill, John A. Little, Thorsten M. Buzug, Juergen Weese, Roland Goecke, Heidrun Schumann and Thomas Netsch. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.