Paul B. Conibear
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Cell Biology
- Biophysics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Clive R. BagshawMichael A. GeevesAndrás Málnási‐CsizmadiaMihály KovácsPiotr G. FajerR.J. EatonPhilip A. KuhlmanKenneth C. Holmes
- Topics
- Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (12 papers)Muscle Physiology and Disorders (5 papers)Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (4 papers)
- Journals
- BiochemistryFEBS LettersPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Partner nations
- United KingdomHungaryGermany
In The Last Decade
Paul B. Conibear
15 papers receiving 364 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 294
- Molecular Biology 218
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 88
- Cell Biology 85
- Biophysics 51
Countries citing papers authored by Paul B. Conibear
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul B. Conibear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul B. Conibear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul B. Conibear more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul B. Conibear
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul B. Conibear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul B. Conibear. The network helps show where Paul B. Conibear may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul B. Conibear
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul B. Conibear. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul B. Conibear based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul B. Conibear. Paul B. Conibear is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | 76 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 57 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | The role of three-state docking of myosin S1 with actin in force generation. | 53 |
About Paul B. Conibear
Paul B. Conibear is a scholar working on Structural Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Biophysics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (12 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (5 papers) and Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (294 citations), Biophysics (51 citations) and Cell Biology (85 citations). Paul B. Conibear has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hungary and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Clive R. Bagshaw, Michael A. Geeves, András Málnási‐Csizmadia, Mihály Kovács, Piotr G. Fajer, R.J. Eaton, Philip A. Kuhlman, Kenneth C. Holmes, Robert Simmons and David R. Trentham. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemistry, FEBS Letters and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.