Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Saint‐Dizier
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Saint‐Dizier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Saint‐Dizier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Saint‐Dizier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Saint‐Dizier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Saint‐Dizier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Saint‐Dizier. The network helps show where Patrick Saint‐Dizier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patrick Saint‐Dizier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patrick Saint‐Dizier.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patrick Saint‐Dizier based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Patrick Saint‐Dizier. Patrick Saint‐Dizier is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Saint‐Dizier, Patrick. (2014). Processing Discourse in Dislog on the TextCoop Platform. International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 25–28.1 indexed citations
Saint‐Dizier, Patrick, et al.. (2012). A Repository of Rules and Lexical Resources for Discourse Structure Analysis: the Case of Explanation Structures. Language Resources and Evaluation. 2778–2785.2 indexed citations
4.
Barcellini, Flore, et al.. (2012). Risk Analysis and Prevention: LELIE, a Tool dedicated to Procedure and Requirement Authoring. Language Resources and Evaluation. 698–705.3 indexed citations
5.
Saint‐Dizier, Patrick, et al.. (2011). The language of explanation dedicated to technical documents. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.4 indexed citations
6.
Saint‐Dizier, Patrick, et al.. (2010). Towards Building Annotated Resources for Analyzing Opinions and Argumentation in News Editorials.. Language Resources and Evaluation. 9(10). 753–4.15 indexed citations
7.
Saint‐Dizier, Patrick, et al.. (2009). Correcting Errors Using the Framework of Argumentation: Towards Generating Argumentative Correction Propositions from Error Annotation Schemas. Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation. 140–149.1 indexed citations
8.
Saint‐Dizier, Patrick. (2008). Some Challenges of Advanced Question-Answering: an Experiment with How-to Questions. Waseda University Repository (Waseda University). 22. 65–73.1 indexed citations
9.
Saint‐Dizier, Patrick. (2006). PrepNet: a Multilingual Lexical Description of Prepositions. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1021–1026.10 indexed citations
10.
Saint‐Dizier, Patrick, et al.. (2005). Towards Generating Procedural Texts: An Exploration of their Rhetorical and Argumentative Structure.6 indexed citations
Dahl, Verónica & Patrick Saint‐Dizier. (1988). Natural Language Understanding and Logic Programming, II: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop, Vancouver, Canada, 17-19 Aug., 1987. Elsevier eBooks.2 indexed citations
18.
Saint‐Dizier, Patrick. (1988). Foundations of DISLOG, Programming in Logic with Discontinuities.. Future Generation Computer Systems. 302–304.1 indexed citations
19.
Saint‐Dizier, Patrick. (1988). Review of Prolog and natural-language analysis: CSLI lecture notes 10 by Fernando C. N. Pereira and Stuart M. Shieber. Center for the Study of Language and Information 1987.. Computational Linguistics. 14(2). 79–80.89 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.