Patrick Bossuyt

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 726 citations indexed

About

Patrick Bossuyt is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Family Practice and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Patrick Bossuyt has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 726 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 2 papers in Family Practice and 2 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Patrick Bossuyt's work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 papers), Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (2 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers). Patrick Bossuyt is often cited by papers focused on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 papers), Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (2 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers). Patrick Bossuyt collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Patrick Bossuyt's co-authors include Johannes B. Reitsma, Anne WS Rutjes, Jos Kleijnen, Penny Whiting, Jonathan J Deeks, Marcello Di Nisio, Mariska Leeflang, Rob Scholten, Jan Brożek and Holger J. Schünemann and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Clinical Chemistry and Statistics in Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Patrick Bossuyt

8 papers receiving 704 citations

Hit Papers

Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment o... 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Patrick Bossuyt United Kingdom 5 167 151 133 126 74 8 726
Ahmed Altibi United States 19 169 1.0× 63 0.4× 112 0.8× 180 1.4× 132 1.8× 58 1.2k
Nira Hadar United States 11 128 0.8× 38 0.3× 107 0.8× 182 1.4× 88 1.2× 30 590
Pietro Di Santo Canada 18 489 2.9× 88 0.6× 134 1.0× 119 0.9× 52 0.7× 67 1.2k
Angela Hardi United States 18 217 1.3× 158 1.0× 132 1.0× 130 1.0× 65 0.9× 55 923
Susan J. Back United States 16 293 1.8× 104 0.7× 125 0.9× 123 1.0× 34 0.5× 72 773
Tania Lourenço United Kingdom 9 181 1.1× 221 1.5× 159 1.2× 291 2.3× 112 1.5× 14 1.0k
Ulrike Kliebsch Switzerland 14 140 0.8× 68 0.5× 86 0.6× 302 2.4× 48 0.6× 32 707
Robert Kwiecien Germany 15 115 0.7× 37 0.2× 128 1.0× 163 1.3× 36 0.5× 36 806
C Cave United Kingdom 11 83 0.5× 39 0.3× 236 1.8× 90 0.7× 43 0.6× 14 792
Gea A. Holtman Netherlands 15 150 0.9× 318 2.1× 125 0.9× 87 0.7× 60 0.8× 58 882

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Bossuyt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Bossuyt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Bossuyt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Bossuyt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Bossuyt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Bossuyt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Bossuyt. The network helps show where Patrick Bossuyt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patrick Bossuyt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patrick Bossuyt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patrick Bossuyt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Patrick Bossuyt. Patrick Bossuyt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Bossuyt, Patrick, Ian Maconochie, Frank J. Smit, et al.. (2022). Practice variation across five European paediatric emergency departments: a prospective observational study. BMJ Open. 12(3). e053382–e053382. 1 indexed citations
2.
Zapf, Antonia, Oke Gerke, Norbert Benda, et al.. (2019). Adaptive trial designs in diagnostic accuracy research. Statistics in Medicine. 39(5). 591–601. 11 indexed citations
3.
Mustafa, Reem A., Wojtek Wiercioch, Nancy Santesso, et al.. (2015). Decision-Making about Healthcare Related Tests and Diagnostic Strategies: User Testing of GRADE Evidence Tables. PLoS ONE. 10(10). e0134553–e0134553. 21 indexed citations
4.
Glasziou, Paul, Douglas G. Altman, Patrick Bossuyt, et al.. (2014). Research: increasing value, reducing waste 5 Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. 2 indexed citations
5.
Schünemann, Holger J., Andrew D Oxman, Jan Brożek, et al.. (2009). Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations for Diagnostic Tests and Strategies. Zhongguo xunzheng yixue zazhi. 9(5). 503–508. 13 indexed citations
6.
Bossuyt, Patrick, John W Williams, Regina Kunz, et al.. (2009). strategies recommendations for diagnostic tests and Grading quality of evidence and strength of. 1 indexed citations
7.
Whiting, Penny, et al.. (2006). Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 6(1). 9–9. 649 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Leeflang, Mariska, Johannes B. Reitsma, Rob Scholten, et al.. (2006). Impact of Adjustment for Quality on Results of Metaanalyses of Diagnostic Accuracy. Clinical Chemistry. 53(2). 164–172. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026