Parkes As
About
In The Last Decade
Parkes As
6 papers receiving 60 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 22
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 15
- Reproductive Medicine 14
- History 11
- Molecular Biology 10
Countries citing papers authored by Parkes As
This map shows the geographic impact of Parkes As's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Parkes As with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Parkes As more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Parkes As
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Parkes As. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Parkes As. The network helps show where Parkes As may publish in the future.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Preservation of living cells at low temperatures. | 2 |
| 2 | Seasonal variation in human sexual activity. | 29 |
| 3 | The rise of reproductive endocrinology, 1926-1940. | 29 |
| 4 | BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE CONTROL OF HUMAN FERTILITY. | 1 |
| 5 | A discussion on viability of mammalian cells & tissues after freezing: introductory remarks. | 2 |
| 6 | Grafting of mouse ovarian tissue after freezing and thawing. | 9 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.