Parasanth Sankar
About
In The Last Decade
Parasanth Sankar
2 papers receiving 2 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 5
- Genetics 1
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1
- Oncology 1
- Pharmacology 1
- Nutrition and Dietetics 1
Countries citing papers authored by Parasanth Sankar
This map shows the geographic impact of Parasanth Sankar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Parasanth Sankar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Parasanth Sankar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Parasanth Sankar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Parasanth Sankar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Parasanth Sankar. The network helps show where Parasanth Sankar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Parasanth Sankar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Parasanth Sankar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Parasanth Sankar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Parasanth Sankar. Parasanth Sankar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | PROTECTIVE EFFECTS OF PIPERINE ON CYPERMETHRININDUCED HAEMATOLOGICAL TOXICITY IN RATS | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.