Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Drug provocation testing in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: general considerations
2003588 citationsWerner Aberer, Andreas J. Bircher et al.Allergyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Paolo Campi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paolo Campi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paolo Campi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paolo Campi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paolo Campi. The network helps show where Paolo Campi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paolo Campi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paolo Campi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paolo Campi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paolo Campi. Paolo Campi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Testi, Sergio, et al.. (2010). Nonirritating concentration for skin testing with cephalosporins.. PubMed. 20(2). 171–2.25 indexed citations
2.
Caruso, Beatrice, et al.. (2010). Cross reactivity between European hornet and yellow jacket venoms.. PubMed. 42(4). 141–5.10 indexed citations
Severino, Maurizio, Paolo Campi, Donatella Macchia, et al.. (2006). EuropeanPolistesvenom allergy. Allergy. 61(7). 860–863.45 indexed citations
10.
Schmid, Daphné A., Paolo Campi, & Werner J. Pichler. (2006). Hypersensitivity Reactions to Quinolones. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 12(26). 3313–3326.26 indexed citations
11.
Manfredi, Mariangela, Maurizio Severino, Sergio Testi, et al.. (2004). Detection of specific IgE to quinolones. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 113(1). 155–160.105 indexed citations
12.
Aberer, Werner, Andreas J. Bircher, Antonino Romano, et al.. (2003). Drug provocation testing in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: general considerations. Allergy. 58(9). 854–863.588 indexed citations breakdown →
Brugnolo, Francesca, Francesco Annunziato, Salvatore Sampognaro, et al.. (1999). Highly Th2-skewed cytokine profile of beta-lactam-specific T cells from nonatopic subjects with adverse drug reactions.. PubMed. 163(2). 1053–9.62 indexed citations
Cristofani, Renza, Paolo Campi, Antonello Bufalari, et al.. (1995). [Gastric cancer in the geriatric patient: our experience].. PubMed. 16(4). 159–68.1 indexed citations
18.
Pichler, Werner J. & Paolo Campi. (1992). Allergy to lysozyme/egg white-containing vaginal suppositories.. PubMed. 69(6). 521–5.21 indexed citations
Surrenti, C., et al.. (1981). Studies of cell-mediated immunity in patients with Crohn's disease.. PubMed. 28(3). 157–9.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.