Pamela M. Smith

1.5k total citations
36 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Pamela M. Smith is a scholar working on Pharmacology, General Health Professions and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Pamela M. Smith has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Pharmacology, 9 papers in General Health Professions and 9 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Pamela M. Smith's work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (9 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (8 papers). Pamela M. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (9 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (8 papers). Pamela M. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Pamela M. Smith's co-authors include Dennis R. Winge, Kenneth J. Ottenbacher, Oleh Khalimonchuk, Jennifer L. Fox, Sandra B. Illig, Hyung J. Kim, Glenn V. Ostir, Byron B. Hamilton, Carl V. Granger and Richard T. Linn and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Molecular and Cellular Biology.

In The Last Decade

Pamela M. Smith

36 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Pamela M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Molecular Biology 421
  • Surgery 150
  • Rehabilitation 134
  • General Health Professions 124
  • Epidemiology 117
Replace Penny Phillips with:
Penny Phillips United States
Shyamal Kumar Das India
Tomoko Ito Japan
Nasheen Naidoo Singapore
Gérard Reach France
Li Jiang China
Kesheng Wang United States
Qinghua Wang China
David Manchester United States
Ling Shi United States
Penny Phillips United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Pamela M. Smith
Pamela M. Smith · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Pamela M. Smith
Pamela M. Smith · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Pamela M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pamela M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pamela M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pamela M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pamela M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pamela M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pamela M. Smith. The network helps show where Pamela M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pamela M. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pamela M. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pamela M. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pamela M. Smith. Pamela M. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 182
2 88
3 48
4 34
5 23
6
DOES CHANGE IN FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE AFFECT QUALITY OF LIFE IN PERSONS WITH ORTHOPAEDIC
1
7 4
8 16
9 10
10 3
11 66
12 44
13 16
14 43
15 39
16 19
17 20
18 1
19 136
20 28

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026