Pamela C. Corley
- Law top 0.2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Strategy and Management
- Co-authors
- Paul M. CollinsJustin WedekingJesse HamnerAmy SteigerwaltStefanie A. LindquistRobert M. HowardDavid C. NixonUdi Sommer
- Topics
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies (20 papers)Legal and Constitutional Studies (12 papers)Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
Pamela C. Corley
24 papers receiving 350 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Law 301
- Economics and Econometrics 210
- Political Science and International Relations 104
- Sociology and Political Science 55
- Strategy and Management 48
Countries citing papers authored by Pamela C. Corley
This map shows the geographic impact of Pamela C. Corley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pamela C. Corley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pamela C. Corley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pamela C. Corley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pamela C. Corley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pamela C. Corley. The network helps show where Pamela C. Corley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pamela C. Corley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pamela C. Corley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pamela C. Corley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pamela C. Corley. Pamela C. Corley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | American Judicial Process: Myth and Reality in Law and Courts | 1 |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content | 4 |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Bargaining and Accommodation on the United States Supreme Court | 2 |
| 19 | 82 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Pamela C. Corley
Pamela C. Corley is a scholar working on Law, Public Administration and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (20 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (12 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (301 citations), Economics and Econometrics (210 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (104 citations). Pamela C. Corley has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Paul M. Collins, Justin Wedeking, Jesse Hamner, Amy Steigerwalt, Stefanie A. Lindquist, Robert M. Howard, David C. Nixon, Udi Sommer and Wendy L. Martinek. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Politics, Law & Society Review and Political Research Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.