Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
CHAMP mission status
2002602 citationsCh. Reigber, H. Lühr et al.Advances in Space Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of P. Schwintzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Schwintzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Schwintzer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Schwintzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Schwintzer. The network helps show where P. Schwintzer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. Schwintzer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. Schwintzer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. Schwintzer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with P. Schwintzer. P. Schwintzer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Reigber, Christoph, H. Lühr, P. Schwintzer, & Jens Wickert. (2005). Earth Observation with CHAMP Results from Three Years in Orbit. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).165 indexed citations
Biancale, R., G. Balmino, Sean Bruinsma, et al.. (2004). Development and Assessment of GRACE Derived Gravity Field Monthly Solutions. AGUFM. 2004.2 indexed citations
5.
Abrikosov, O. A. & P. Schwintzer. (2004). RECOVERY OF THE EARTH'S GRAVITY FIELD FROM GOCE SATELLITE GRAVITY GRADIOMETRY: A CASE STUDY.3 indexed citations
Kaban, Mikhail K., P. Schwintzer, & Ch. Reigber. (2003). New isostatic model of the lithosphere and gravity field. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 6550.1 indexed citations
Reigber, C., Frank Flechtner, Rolf Koenig, et al.. (2002). GRACE Orbit and Gravity Field Recovery at GFZ Potsdam - First Experiences and Perspectives. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 2002.12 indexed citations
13.
Reigber, Ch., H. Lühr, & P. Schwintzer. (2002). CHAMP mission status. Advances in Space Research. 30(2). 129–134.602 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Reigber, Ch., P. Schwintzer, Rolf Koenig, et al.. (2001). Earth Gravity Field Solutions from Several Months of CHAMP Satellite Data. AGUFM. 2001.7 indexed citations
15.
Schwintzer, P., et al.. (1999). The CHAMP geopotential mission. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences).41 indexed citations
Jentzsch, G., et al.. (1997). Tidal gravity measurements within the MOTIVE project. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences).1 indexed citations
19.
Schwintzer, P., C. Reigber, Albert Bode, et al.. (1994). Improvement of global gravity field modelling for ERS-1. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 2. 771–775.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.