P. Lamperti

437 total citations
20 papers, 295 citations indexed

About

P. Lamperti is a scholar working on Radiation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, P. Lamperti has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 295 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Radiation, 10 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 7 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in P. Lamperti's work include Radiation Dose and Imaging (10 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (7 papers) and Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (5 papers). P. Lamperti is often cited by papers focused on Radiation Dose and Imaging (10 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (7 papers) and Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (5 papers). P. Lamperti collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Italy. P. Lamperti's co-authors include Steve R. Domen, Michael G. Mitch, S. M. Seltzer, Mark K. Murphy, L.R. Greenwood, Mark H. Phillips, M Boutillon, D.W. Pearson, Harold O. Wyckoff and Larry A. DeWerd and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics in Medicine and Biology, Medical Physics and Metrologia.

In The Last Decade

P. Lamperti

20 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
P. Lamperti United States 10 214 126 114 77 57 20 295
M Boutillon France 9 280 1.3× 152 1.2× 151 1.3× 104 1.4× 32 0.6× 19 333
A. Allisy France 6 150 0.7× 132 1.0× 93 0.8× 44 0.6× 31 0.5× 26 252
L.A.R. da Rosa Brazil 11 249 1.2× 165 1.3× 131 1.1× 77 1.0× 61 1.1× 36 366
A.H.L. Aalbers Netherlands 8 252 1.2× 177 1.4× 154 1.4× 31 0.4× 32 0.6× 10 269
V. Kamenopoulou Greece 12 107 0.5× 89 0.7× 190 1.7× 44 0.6× 108 1.9× 37 328
C Kessler France 9 215 1.0× 94 0.7× 138 1.2× 74 1.0× 25 0.4× 72 279
H. Stadtmann Austria 13 282 1.3× 137 1.1× 180 1.6× 95 1.2× 33 0.6× 56 417
E. Fantuzzi Italy 14 317 1.5× 194 1.5× 271 2.4× 47 0.6× 47 0.8× 55 521
Mária Ranogajec-Komor Croatia 12 243 1.1× 100 0.8× 157 1.4× 132 1.7× 61 1.1× 39 442
Isabelle Aubineau-Lanièce France 11 186 0.9× 124 1.0× 201 1.8× 17 0.2× 26 0.5× 30 273

Countries citing papers authored by P. Lamperti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Lamperti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Lamperti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Lamperti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Lamperti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Lamperti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Lamperti. The network helps show where P. Lamperti may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. Lamperti

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. Lamperti. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. Lamperti based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with P. Lamperti. P. Lamperti is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Murphy, Mark K., L.R. Greenwood, Michael G. Mitch, et al.. (2004). Evaluation of the new cesium‐131 seed for use in low‐energy x‐ray brachytherapy. Medical Physics. 31(6). 1529–1538. 86 indexed citations
2.
Burns, D T, et al.. (2003). Comparison of the NIST and BIPM medium-energy X-ray air-kerma measurements. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. 108(5). 383–383. 2 indexed citations
3.
DeWerd, Larry A., et al.. (2002). The effect of spectra on calibration and measurement with mammographic ionization chambers. Medical Physics. 29(11). 2649–2654. 17 indexed citations
4.
O’Brien, M.R., et al.. (2000). Comparison of the NIST and NPL air kerma standards used for X-ray measurements between 10 kV and 80 kV. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. 105(5). 701–701. 2 indexed citations
5.
Mitch, Michael G., Brian E. Zimmerman, P. Lamperti, S. M. Seltzer, & Bert M. Coursey. (2000). Well-ionization chamber response relative to NIST air-kerma strength standard for prostate brachytherapy seeds. Medical Physics. 27(10). 2293–2296. 9 indexed citations
6.
Burns, D T, et al.. (1999). Comparison of the NIST and BIPM air-kerma standards for measurements in the low-energy x-ray range. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. 104(2). 135–135. 4 indexed citations
7.
SenGupta, Sumana, et al.. (1999). State of the Art of Environmental Dosimetry: 11th International Intercomparison and Proposed Performance Tests. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 85(1). 201–206. 12 indexed citations
8.
Lamperti, P., et al.. (1998). Comparison of the NIST and ENEA air kerma standards. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. 103(4). 365–365. 5 indexed citations
9.
Pearson, D.W., et al.. (1997). Comparison of exposure standards in the mammography x‐ray region. Medical Physics. 24(8). 1263–1267. 13 indexed citations
10.
Boutillon, M, et al.. (1997). International comparisons of air kerma standards in137Cs gamma radiation. Metrologia. 34(2). 169–175. 5 indexed citations
11.
Boutillon, M, et al.. (1996). Comparison of the Standards for Air Kerma of the NIST and the BIPM for 60Co ³ Rays | NIST. 96. 2 indexed citations
12.
Lamperti, P., et al.. (1988). NBS (National Bureau of Standards) measurement services: calibration of x-ray and gamma-ray measuring instruments. Final report. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 2 indexed citations
13.
Loevinger, R., et al.. (1984). Comments on “Clarification of proper ion chamber biasing”. Medical Physics. 11(6). 878–878. 1 indexed citations
14.
Domen, Steve R. & P. Lamperti. (1976). Comparisons of calorimetric and ionometric measurements in graphite irradiated with electrons from 15 to 50 MeV. Medical Physics. 3(5). 294–301. 10 indexed citations
15.
Humphreys, J.C., et al.. (1975). Comparison of Cobalt-60 Exposure Determinations by Calorimetry and by Ionization Chamber Techniques. Metrologia. 11(1). 11–15. 3 indexed citations
16.
Domen, Steve R. & P. Lamperti. (1974). A heat-loss-compensated calorimeter: theory, design, and performance. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards Section A Physics and Chemistry. 78A(5). 595–595. 67 indexed citations
17.
Lamperti, P., et al.. (1969). Uniformity of high-energy electron-beam calibrations. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 14(2). 305–314. 10 indexed citations
18.
Boutillon, M, et al.. (1969). Comparison of Exposure Standards in the 10–50 kV X-Ray Region. Metrologia. 5(1). 1–11. 22 indexed citations
19.
Lamperti, P., et al.. (1967). A comparison of absorbed dose determinations in graphite by cavity ionization measurements and by calorimetry. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards Section C Engineering and Instrumentation. 71C(1). 19–19. 13 indexed citations
20.
Lamperti, P. & Harold O. Wyckoff. (1965). NBS free-air chamber for measurement of 10 to 60 kV x rays. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards Section C Engineering and Instrumentation. 69C(1). 39–39. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026