This map shows the geographic impact of P. Kervin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Kervin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Kervin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Kervin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Kervin. The network helps show where P. Kervin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. Kervin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. Kervin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. Kervin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with P. Kervin. P. Kervin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kervin, P., et al.. (2015). Multi-sensor Observations of the SpinSat Satellite. amos. 66.1 indexed citations
2.
Hunt, Bobby R., et al.. (2014). Comparison of Unscented Kalman Filter and Unscented Schmidt Kalman Filter in Predicting Attitude and Associated Uncertainty of a Geosynchronous Satellite. Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference.2 indexed citations
3.
Kervin, P., et al.. (2014). Optical Characterization of Deep-Space Object Rotation States. amos.9 indexed citations
4.
Lederer, Susan M., et al.. (2013). The NASA Meter Class Autonomous Telescope: Ascension Island. Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference.11 indexed citations
5.
Jah, Moriba, et al.. (2013). Analysis of PAN-STARRS Photometric and Astrometric Data for Data Association and Physical Consistency Assessment. 723. 28.1 indexed citations
6.
Kervin, P., et al.. (2013). Analysis of Faint Glints from Stabilized GEO Satellites. Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference.2 indexed citations
7.
Hall, David F., et al.. (2012). Satellite Surface Characterization from Non-resolved Multi-band Optical Observations. Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference. 24.2 indexed citations
8.
Kervin, P., et al.. (2011). Pan-STARRRS Status and Geo Observations Results. amos.4 indexed citations
9.
Kervin, P., et al.. (2010). Panoramic-Survey Telescope And Rapid Response System: Leveraging Astronomical Technology for Satellite Situational Awareness. 38. 3.
10.
Kervin, P., et al.. (2010). Satellite Attitude from a Raven Class Telescope. amos.3 indexed citations
11.
Kervin, P., et al.. (2009). Analysis of Object Observations Using a 1.8- Meter Telescope. 672. 6.1 indexed citations
12.
Kervin, P., et al.. (2006). Maui Space Surveillance System Satellite Categorization Laboratory. amos.1 indexed citations
13.
Africano, J. L., et al.. (2006). AMOS Observations of NASA's IMAGE Satellite. amos.20 indexed citations
14.
Africano, J. L., et al.. (2005). Understanding Photometric Phase Angle Corrections. 587. 141.10 indexed citations
15.
Stansbery, E., et al.. (2002). The optical orbital debris mesurement program at NASA and AMOS. 34. 1394.1 indexed citations
16.
Hsu, Yuling, Bruce A. Cameron, P. Kervin, et al.. (2000). <title>New home for NEAT on the 1.2m/B37 at AMOS</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 4091. 225–236.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.