Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources
1980841 citationsP. Dasgupta, Geoffrey HealCambridge University Press eBooksprofile →
Differential Taxation, Public Goods, and Economic Efficiency
1971241 citationsJoseph E. Stiglitz, P. DasguptaThe Review of Economic Studiesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of P. Dasgupta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Dasgupta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Dasgupta more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Dasgupta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Dasgupta. The network helps show where P. Dasgupta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. Dasgupta
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. Dasgupta.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. Dasgupta based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with P. Dasgupta. P. Dasgupta is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dasgupta, P., et al.. (2012). Intergenerational Equity, Social Discount Rates and Global Warming. Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University).10 indexed citations
3.
Maskin, Eric & P. Dasgupta. (2007). Bargaining and Destructive Power. 8(2). 217–227.8 indexed citations
4.
Curran, Sara R., Tundi Agardy, P. Dasgupta, et al.. (2002). Population, Consumption, Environment. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).1 indexed citations
5.
Chopra, Kanchan & P. Dasgupta. (2002). Common pool resources and the development process: Evidence from India.. Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University).2 indexed citations
6.
Chopra, Kanchan & P. Dasgupta. (2002). Common pool resources in India: evidence, significance and new management initiatives..6 indexed citations
7.
Chopra, Kanchan & P. Dasgupta. (2001). Common pool resources in India: New evidence and new initiatives..1 indexed citations
8.
Dasgupta, P. & Eric Maskin. (2000). Efficient Auctions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 115(2). 341–388.202 indexed citations
9.
Dasgupta, P.. (1995). The population problem: theory and evidence.. Journal of Economic Literature. 33(4). 1879–1902.151 indexed citations
10.
Arrow, K. J., et al.. (1995). Crecimiento económico y calidad ambiental: vinculando la economía y la ecología.1 indexed citations
11.
Dasgupta, P.. (1988). Lives and well-being. Social Choice and Welfare. 5(2-3). 103–126.15 indexed citations
Stiglitz, Joseph E. & P. Dasgupta. (1971). Differential Taxation, Public Goods, and Economic Efficiency. The Review of Economic Studies. 38(2). 151–151.241 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Dasgupta, P.. (1970). An analysis of two approaches to project evaluation in developing countries.. 5–15.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.