Owe Philipsen

5.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
132 papers, 3.4k citations indexed

About

Owe Philipsen is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Condensed Matter Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Owe Philipsen has authored 132 papers receiving a total of 3.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 122 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 38 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 18 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Owe Philipsen's work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (117 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (95 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (76 papers). Owe Philipsen is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (117 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (95 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (76 papers). Owe Philipsen collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Owe Philipsen's co-authors include Philippe de Forcrand, M. Laine, Marcus Tassler, Guy D. Moore, A. Hart, Paul Romatschke, Jens Langelage, Mark Hindmarsh, Hartmut Wittig and Oliver Jahn and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Nuclear Physics B.

In The Last Decade

Owe Philipsen

126 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Hit Papers

The QCD phase diagram for small densities from imaginary ... 2002 2026 2010 2018 2002 2009 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Owe Philipsen Germany 29 3.2k 558 469 360 227 132 3.4k
Massimo D’Elia Italy 40 4.2k 1.3× 599 1.1× 614 1.3× 559 1.6× 122 0.5× 187 4.5k
Marek Karliner Israel 30 3.5k 1.1× 152 0.3× 248 0.5× 387 1.1× 125 0.6× 125 3.8k
Gunnar Bali Germany 39 5.4k 1.7× 603 1.1× 441 0.9× 478 1.3× 72 0.3× 132 5.6k
Thomas Mehen United States 32 2.6k 0.8× 335 0.6× 107 0.2× 381 1.1× 551 2.4× 77 2.9k
Jan Smit Netherlands 29 1.9k 0.6× 383 0.7× 496 1.1× 557 1.5× 279 1.2× 76 2.3k
M. Teper United Kingdom 38 3.7k 1.2× 233 0.4× 839 1.8× 331 0.9× 195 0.9× 151 3.9k
J. Berges Germany 23 1.1k 0.3× 331 0.6× 378 0.8× 1.0k 2.8× 277 1.2× 38 1.9k
L. Scorzato Germany 20 1.7k 0.5× 113 0.2× 381 0.8× 386 1.1× 130 0.6× 65 2.0k
Daniele Binosi Italy 36 3.8k 1.2× 199 0.4× 95 0.2× 344 1.0× 224 1.0× 102 4.1k
A. Barducci Italy 20 1.4k 0.4× 281 0.5× 169 0.4× 357 1.0× 320 1.4× 58 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Owe Philipsen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Owe Philipsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Owe Philipsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Owe Philipsen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Owe Philipsen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Owe Philipsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Owe Philipsen. The network helps show where Owe Philipsen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Owe Philipsen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Owe Philipsen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Owe Philipsen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Owe Philipsen. Owe Philipsen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Philipsen, Owe, et al.. (2025). The order of the chiral phase transition in massless many-flavour lattice QCD. Proceedings Of Science. 172–172.
2.
Kaczmarek, Olaf, et al.. (2024). Pseudo-scalar meson spectral properties in the chiral crossover region of QCD. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2024(5). 9 indexed citations
3.
Philipsen, Owe, et al.. (2024). Simulating $Z_{2}$ lattice gauge theory with the variational quantum thermalizer. EPJ Quantum Technology. 11(1). 7 indexed citations
4.
Philipsen, Owe, et al.. (2024). Quantum gate sets for lattice QCD in the strong-coupling limit: $N_{f}=1$. EPJ Quantum Technology. 11(1). 3 indexed citations
5.
Philipsen, Owe, et al.. (2023). Mean field approximation for effective theories of lattice QCD. Proceedings of The 39th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2022). 179–179. 2 indexed citations
6.
Philipsen, Owe, et al.. (2023). Dihedral lattice gauge theories on a quantum annealer. EPJ Quantum Technology. 10(1). 7 indexed citations
7.
Philipsen, Owe, P. Lowdon, L. Ya. Glozman, & Robert D. Pisarski. (2023). On chiral spin symmetry and the QCD phase diagram. Proceedings of The 39th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2022). 189–189. 4 indexed citations
8.
Philipsen, Owe, et al.. (2023). The chiral phase transition at non-zero imaginary baryon chemical potential for different numbers of quark flavours. Proceedings of The 39th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2022). 172–172. 3 indexed citations
9.
Philipsen, Owe, et al.. (2023). Non-perturbative determination of couplings in Polyakov loop effective theories. Proceedings of The 39th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2022). 196–196. 1 indexed citations
10.
Philipsen, Owe, et al.. (2023). Towards the phase diagram of cold and dense heavy QCD. Proceedings of The 39th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2022). 145–145. 1 indexed citations
11.
Capitani, Stefano, et al.. (2018). Computation of hybrid static potentials in SU(3) lattice gauge theory. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 10 indexed citations
12.
Philipsen, Owe. (2017). Towards a theoretical description of dense QCD. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 4 indexed citations
13.
Philipsen, Owe, et al.. (2017). Roberge-Weiss transition in N$_{f}$=2 QCD with staggered fermions and N$_{\tau}$=6. 55–55. 1 indexed citations
14.
Brandt, Bastian B., et al.. (2011). Towards the N[sub f] = 2 deconfinement transition temperature with O(a) improved Wilson fermions: An update. AIP conference proceedings. 516–518. 2 indexed citations
15.
Laine, M., Marcus Tassler, Guy D. Moore, & Owe Philipsen. (2009). Heavy Quark Thermalization in Classical Lattice Gauge Theory. arXiv (Cornell University). 5. 14. 349 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Hindmarsh, Mark & Owe Philipsen. (2006). QCD equation of state and dark matter. Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt). 7.
17.
Pérez, Margarita Garcı́a, Owe Philipsen, & Ion-Olimpiu Stamatescu. (1999). 1 Cooling, Physical Scales and the Vacuum Structure of Y-M Theories.. 1 indexed citations
18.
Philipsen, Owe & Hartmut Wittig. (1998). 1 The static potential beyond screening in the 3d SU(2) Higgs model. 1 indexed citations
19.
Allanach, B. C., Giovanni Amelino-Camelia, & Owe Philipsen. (1996). Infra-red fixed point structure characterising SUSY SU(5) symmetry breaking. Science and Technology Facilities Council. 4 indexed citations
20.
Philipsen, Owe, M. Teper, & Hartmut Wittig. (1996). 1 Mass Spectrum of the 3d SU(2) Higgs Model and the Symmetric Electroweak Phase ∗. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026