Otto Scherzer

1.9k total citations
5 papers, 48 citations indexed

About

Otto Scherzer is a scholar working on Structural Biology, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Otto Scherzer has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 48 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Structural Biology, 2 papers in Surfaces, Coatings and Films and 1 paper in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in Otto Scherzer's work include Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (2 papers) and Science, Research, and Medicine (1 paper). Otto Scherzer is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (2 papers) and Science, Research, and Medicine (1 paper). Otto Scherzer collaborates with scholars based in Germany. Otto Scherzer's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Ultramicroscopy, Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie and PubMed.

In The Last Decade

Otto Scherzer

5 papers receiving 40 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Otto Scherzer Germany	3	39	37	19	8	4	5	48
T. Vecchione United States	4	12 0.3×	19 0.5×	10 0.5×	8 1.0×	6 1.5×	5	28
Hiroki Iriguchi Japan	3	8 0.2×	7 0.2×	14 0.7×	12 1.5×	4 1.0×	4	25
J Sheffield-Parker Australia	3	8 0.2×	7 0.2×	23 1.2×	3 0.4×		3	34
D. Eckstein Switzerland	2	7 0.2×	4 0.1×	28 1.5×	29 3.6×	4 1.0×	2	45
Marc Planas Germany	5	7 0.2×	16 0.4×	63 3.3×	38 4.8×	3 0.8×	8	71
G. Steinbrück Germany	2	7 0.2×	4 0.1×	25 1.3×	25 3.1×	4 1.0×	2	43
O. L. Fedin Russia	2	2 0.1×	9 0.2×	19 1.0×	10 1.3×	1 0.3×	3	47
E. Yamamoto United States	5	9 0.2×	5 0.1×	39 2.1×	79 9.9×	1 0.3×	5	88
T. C. H. de Raadt Netherlands	3	4 0.1×	10 0.3×	6 0.3×	6 0.8×	19 4.8×	4	30
Dardan Gashi Switzerland	3	3 0.1×	7 0.2×	6 0.3×	2 0.3×	7 1.8×	4	31

Countries citing papers authored by Otto Scherzer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Otto Scherzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Otto Scherzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Otto Scherzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Otto Scherzer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Otto Scherzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Otto Scherzer. The network helps show where Otto Scherzer may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Scherzer, Otto. (1982). Phase tomography in the corrected electron microscope. Ultramicroscopy. 9(1-2). 9–15. 6 indexed citations

2.

Scherzer, Otto. (1982). How not to correct an electron lens. Ultramicroscopy. 9(4). 385–385. 1 indexed citations

3.

Scherzer, Otto. (1978). Limitations for the Resolving Power of Electron Microscopes. Proceedings annual meeting Electron Microscopy Society of America. 36(3). 123–129. 4 indexed citations

4.

Scherzer, Otto. (1970). Die Strahlenschädigung der Objekte als Grenze für die hochauflösende Elektronenmikroskopie. Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie. 74(11). 1154–1167. 36 indexed citations

5.

Scherzer, Otto. (1965). IMAGE FORMATION AS A PROBLEM OF WAVE THEORY.. PubMed. 14. 797–800. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact