Oszkár Bíró

5.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
255 papers, 3.9k citations indexed

About

Oszkár Bíró is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, Oszkár Bíró has authored 255 papers receiving a total of 3.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 194 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 99 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 94 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. Recurrent topics in Oszkár Bíró's work include Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (103 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (94 papers) and Electric Motor Design and Analysis (56 papers). Oszkár Bíró is often cited by papers focused on Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (103 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (94 papers) and Electric Motor Design and Analysis (56 papers). Oszkár Bíró collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Iran and Slovenia. Oszkár Bíró's co-authors include Kurt Preis, K.R. Richter, I. Bardi, Christian Magele, I. Tičar, G. Vrisk, Karl Hollaus, Werner Renhart, Romanus Dyczij‐Edlinger and Mark E. Everett and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics and Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

In The Last Decade

Oszkár Bíró

238 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Hit Papers

On the use of the magneti... 1989 2026 2001 2013 1989 100 200 300 400 500

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Oszkár Bíró 2.8k 1.3k 1.3k 679 526 255 3.9k
Kurt Preis 1.9k 0.7× 797 0.6× 964 0.8× 508 0.7× 333 0.6× 152 3.0k
P. Silvester 3.7k 1.3× 864 0.7× 816 0.6× 1.5k 2.2× 670 1.3× 148 4.8k
Koji Fujiwara 1.8k 0.6× 1.4k 1.1× 1.0k 0.8× 538 0.8× 344 0.7× 312 3.3k
Patrick Dular 1.9k 0.7× 1.0k 0.8× 705 0.6× 460 0.7× 348 0.7× 188 2.6k
Z.J. Cendes 2.7k 1.0× 760 0.6× 459 0.4× 1.2k 1.8× 417 0.8× 130 3.3k
T. Nakata 1.4k 0.5× 1.1k 0.9× 964 0.8× 399 0.6× 229 0.4× 145 2.1k
Nathan Ida 1.1k 0.4× 250 0.2× 542 0.4× 369 0.5× 257 0.5× 133 2.1k
G. Rubinacci 1.1k 0.4× 343 0.3× 549 0.4× 454 0.7× 94 0.2× 159 2.3k
Pavel Ripka 3.5k 1.3× 604 0.5× 1.9k 1.5× 891 1.3× 88 0.2× 233 4.4k
Adel Razek 1.6k 0.6× 641 0.5× 546 0.4× 339 0.5× 553 1.1× 145 2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Oszkár Bíró

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Oszkár Bíró's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oszkár Bíró with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oszkár Bíró more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Oszkár Bíró

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oszkár Bíró. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oszkár Bíró. The network helps show where Oszkár Bíró may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Oszkár Bíró

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Oszkár Bíró. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Oszkár Bíró based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Oszkár Bíró. Oszkár Bíró is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bíró, Oszkár, P. Testoni, & A. Portone. (2023). An Improved 3-D MHD Equilibrium Formulation. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 60(3). 1–4. 1 indexed citations
2.
Albert, Christopher G., et al.. (2022). 2D Fourier finite element formulation for magnetostatics in curvilinear coordinates with a symmetry direction. Computer Physics Communications. 277. 108401–108401.
3.
Bíró, Oszkár, et al.. (2022). FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR NONLINEAR EDDY CURRENT PROBLEMS IN POWER TRANSFORMERS. Journal of Energy - Energija. 61(1-4). 87–96. 1 indexed citations
4.
Bíró, Oszkár, et al.. (2019). Improved Coupling Strategy to Cover Curved FE-Facets in the Non-Conforming Mesh Method. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 55(6). 1–4. 2 indexed citations
5.
Bíró, Oszkár, et al.. (2019). Numerical Simulation of Conductivity Changes in the Human Thorax Caused by Aortic Dissection. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 55(6). 1–4. 8 indexed citations
6.
Bíró, Oszkár, et al.. (2013). Finite element solution of nonlinear eddy current problems with periodic excitation and its industrial applications. Applied Numerical Mathematics. 79(100). 3–17. 21 indexed citations
7.
Preis, Kurt, et al.. (2011). Equivalent circuit description for UHF-RFID tag antennas utilizing inductively coupled feeding structures. International Conference on Telecommunications. 23–30. 2 indexed citations
8.
Ellermann, Katrin, et al.. (2011). Numerische und Experimentelle Modalanalyse eines Statorblechpaketes. PAMM. 11(1). 245–246. 3 indexed citations
9.
Bíró, Oszkár, et al.. (2011). Fast Time-Domain Finite Element Analysis of 3-D Nonlinear Time-Periodic Eddy Current Problems With ${\rm T},\Phi-\Phi$ Formulation. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 47(5). 1170–1173. 16 indexed citations
10.
Bíró, Oszkár, et al.. (2011). Computation of the noise radiation of an induction machine using 3D FEM/BEM. COMPEL The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. 30(6). 1737–1750. 8 indexed citations
11.
Bíró, Oszkár, et al.. (2007). Prediction of magnetising current waveform in a single-phase power transformer under DC bias. IET Science Measurement & Technology. 1(1). 2–5. 19 indexed citations
13.
Scharfetter, Hermann, et al.. (2004). Planar gradiometer for magnetic induction tomography (MIT): theoretical and experimental sensitivity maps for a low-contrast phantom. Physiological Measurement. 25(1). 325–333. 19 indexed citations
14.
Merwa, Robert, Karl Hollaus, Oszkár Bíró, & Hermann Scharfetter. (2004). Detection of brain oedema using magnetic induction tomography: a feasibility study of the likely sensitivity and detectability. Physiological Measurement. 25(1). 347–354. 78 indexed citations
15.
Bíró, Oszkár, et al.. (2004). Finite element model to compute transformer losses. 330–333. 1 indexed citations
16.
Bíró, Oszkár, et al.. (2003). Multigrid for transient 3D eddy current analysis. COMPEL The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. 22(3). 779–788. 8 indexed citations
17.
Bíró, Oszkár. (2002). Computation of the flux linkage of windings from magnetic scalar potential finite element solutions. IEE Proceedings - Science Measurement and Technology. 149(5). 182–185. 4 indexed citations
18.
Everett, Mark E., et al.. (2001). Finite-element analysis of controlled-source electromagnetic induction using Coulomb-gauged potentials. Geophysics. 66(3). 786–799. 154 indexed citations
19.
Hollaus, Karl & Oszkár Bíró. (2000). A FEM formulation to treat 3D eddy currents in laminations. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 36(4). 1289–1292. 24 indexed citations
20.
Bíró, Oszkár & Kurt Preis. (1989). On the use of the magnetic vector potential in the finite-element analysis of three-dimensional eddy currents. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 25(4). 3145–3159. 553 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026