Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Oswald Ducrot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oswald Ducrot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oswald Ducrot more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oswald Ducrot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oswald Ducrot. The network helps show where Oswald Ducrot may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Oswald Ducrot
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Oswald Ducrot.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Oswald Ducrot based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Oswald Ducrot. Oswald Ducrot is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ducrot, Oswald. (2013). A pragmática e o estudo semântico da língua. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 40(1). 9–21.1 indexed citations
2.
Ducrot, Oswald, et al.. (2008). Descrição argumentativa e descrição polifônica: o caso da negação. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
Ducrot, Oswald. (1998). Léxico y gradualidad. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 175–196.1 indexed citations
5.
Todorov, Tzvetan & Oswald Ducrot. (1998). Diccionario enciclopédico de las ciencias del lenguaje.44 indexed citations
6.
Ducrot, Oswald. (1997). La pragmatique et l' étude sémantique de la langue. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 32(1). 9–21.4 indexed citations
7.
Ducrot, Oswald, et al.. (1995). Nouveau dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage.41 indexed citations
8.
Anscombre, Jean-Claude, et al.. (1994). La argumentación en la lengua. Gredos eBooks.35 indexed citations
9.
Ducrot, Oswald. (1991). Dire et ne pas dire : principes de sémantique linguistique. Hermann eBooks.69 indexed citations
10.
Ducrot, Oswald. (1989). Logique, structure, énonciation : lectures sur le langage.7 indexed citations
11.
Ducrot, Oswald. (1984). Le dire et le dit.268 indexed citations
12.
Ducrot, Oswald & Tzvetan Todorov. (1978). Dicionário das ciências da linguagem. 1–362.7 indexed citations
13.
Ducrot, Oswald, et al.. (1975). El estructuralismo en lingüística.1 indexed citations
14.
Ducrot, Oswald, François Wahl, & Eva Moldenhauer. (1973). Einführung in den Strukturalismus. Suhrkamp eBooks.1 indexed citations
15.
Ducrot, Oswald, et al.. (1972). De la théorie linguistique à l'enseignement de la langue. Presses Universitaires de France eBooks.2 indexed citations
16.
Ducrot, Oswald & Tzvetan Todorov. (1972). Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage. Éditions du Seuil eBooks.68 indexed citations
17.
Ducrot, Oswald. (1968). Estruturalismo e lingüística.
18.
Ducrot, Oswald. (1968). Le structuralisme en linguistique. Seuil eBooks.15 indexed citations
19.
Ducrot, Oswald & François Wahl. (1968). Qu'est-ce que le structuralisme?. Éditions du Seuil eBooks.21 indexed citations
20.
Ducrot, Oswald. (1966). Tzvetan Todorov, « Recherches sémantiques », Langages, 1966, n° 1. Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.