464 total citations 8 papers, 396 citations indexed
About
Osborne Ck is a scholar working on Genetics, Oncology and Cancer Research.
According to data from OpenAlex, Osborne Ck has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 396 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Genetics, 4 papers in Oncology and 3 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Osborne Ck's work include Estrogen and related hormone effects (5 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers). Osborne Ck is often cited by papers focused on Estrogen and related hormone effects (5 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers). Osborne Ck collaborates with scholars based in United States. Osborne Ck's co-authors include McGuire Wl, Paula Estrada, Tormey Dc, Cooper Mr and Geoffrey Falkson and has published in prestigious journals such as PubMed and Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich).
Citations per year, relative to Osborne Ck Osborne Ck (= 1×)
peers
G C Chamness
Countries citing papers authored by Osborne Ck
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Osborne Ck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Osborne Ck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Osborne Ck more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Osborne Ck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Osborne Ck. The network helps show where Osborne Ck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Osborne Ck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Osborne Ck.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Osborne Ck based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Osborne Ck. Osborne Ck is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Ck, Osborne, et al.. (2006). Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor in breast cancer cell lines with a recombinant ligand fusion toxin (DAB389EGF).. PubMed. 2(3). 175–80.2 indexed citations
2.
Wl, McGuire, et al.. (1992). Prognostic factors in breast cancer.. PubMed. 19(3). 244–53.69 indexed citations
3.
Dc, Tormey, et al.. (1992). Chemotherapy versus observation in high-risk node-negative breast cancer patients.. PubMed. 97–104.5 indexed citations
4.
Ck, Osborne, et al.. (1989). Adjuvant treatment of node-negative breast cancer.. PubMed. 85(1). 32–6.5 indexed citations
5.
Ck, Osborne. (1985). Heterogeneity in hormone receptor status in primary and metastatic breast cancer.. PubMed. 12(3). 317–26.57 indexed citations
6.
Ck, Osborne, et al.. (1984). Human breast cancer cell cycle synchronization by estrogens and antiestrogens in culture.. PubMed. 44(4). 1433–9.90 indexed citations
7.
Ck, Osborne, et al.. (1980). Steroid hormone receptors in the management of human breast cancer.. PubMed. 12(5). 202–7.51 indexed citations
8.
Ck, Osborne, et al.. (1978). Correlation Among Insulin Binding, Degradation, and Biological Activity in Human Breast Cancer Cells in Long-Term Tissue Culture. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 38(1). 94–102.117 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.