Omnia El Shakry
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Anthropology top 10%
- History top 5%
- Gender Studies
- Topics
- Islamic Studies and History (14 papers)Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (14 papers)African history and culture analysis (4 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewInternational Feminist Journal of PoliticsInternational Journal Middle East Studies
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Omnia El Shakry
19 papers receiving 200 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Sociology and Political Science 174
- Political Science and International Relations 141
- Anthropology 62
- History 35
- Gender Studies 21
Countries citing papers authored by Omnia El Shakry
This map shows the geographic impact of Omnia El Shakry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Omnia El Shakry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Omnia El Shakry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Omnia El Shakry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Omnia El Shakry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Omnia El Shakry. The network helps show where Omnia El Shakry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Omnia El Shakry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Omnia El Shakry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Omnia El Shakry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Omnia El Shakry. Omnia El Shakry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | The Arabic Freud: Psychoanalysis and Islam in Modern Egypt | 40 |
| 10 | 42 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Peasants, Crime, and Tea in Interwar Egypt | 2 |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | The Great Social Laboratory: Subjects of Knowledge in Colonial and Postcolonial Egypt | 61 |
| 19 | 47 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Omnia El Shakry
Omnia El Shakry is a scholar working on General Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (14 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (14 papers) and African history and culture analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (12 citations), Anthropology (62 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (141 citations). Omnia El Shakry has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Amar, Barbara Taylor, Eli Zaretsky, Christopher Lane, Michael Rothberg and Stephen Frosh. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, International Feminist Journal of Politics and International Journal Middle East Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.