Ömer Faik Ersoy
- Co-authors
- Namık ÖzkanHüseyin Ayhan KayaoğluGülden Z. OmurtağTürkan YurdunReşit Doğan KöseoğluSelçuk HazinedaroğluAlper Çelikİşıl Işik Andsoy
- Topics
- Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (5 papers)Hernia repair and management (5 papers)Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (4 papers)
- Cited by
- SurgeryFuel TechnologyPlant Science
- Partner nations
- TürkiyeUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ömer Faik Ersoy
24 papers receiving 300 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Surgery 177
- Plant Science 77
- Oncology 36
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 30
- Rheumatology 28
Countries citing papers authored by Ömer Faik Ersoy
This map shows the geographic impact of Ömer Faik Ersoy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ömer Faik Ersoy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ömer Faik Ersoy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ömer Faik Ersoy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ömer Faik Ersoy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ömer Faik Ersoy. The network helps show where Ömer Faik Ersoy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ömer Faik Ersoy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ömer Faik Ersoy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ömer Faik Ersoy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ömer Faik Ersoy. Ömer Faik Ersoy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | Melatonin exhibits supportive effects on oxidantsand anastomotic healing during intestinalischemia/reperfusion injury | 3 |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | The Effect of Peritoneal Prednisolone Lavage in Bacterial Peritonitis: An Experimental Study. | 1 |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | Comparison of cyanoacrylate-assisted arteriotomy closure with conventional closure technique. | 6 |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | 76 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Ömer Faik Ersoy
Ömer Faik Ersoy is a scholar working on Fuel Technology, Urology and Internal Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (5 papers), Hernia repair and management (5 papers) and Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (177 citations), Fuel Technology (2 citations) and Plant Science (77 citations). Ömer Faik Ersoy has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Namık Özkan, Hüseyin Ayhan Kayaoğlu, Gülden Z. Omurtağ, Türkan Yurdun, Reşit Doğan Köseoğlu, Selçuk Hazinedaroğlu, Alper Çelik, İşıl Işik Andsoy, Ayhan Bülent Erkek and Zeki Özsoy. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, Journal of the American College of Surgeons and Journal of Food Protection.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.