Oliver Redfern
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 1%
Papers in
-
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies 11
- Co-authors
- Christine OrengoDavid LeeGary B. SmithPeter GriffithsAlejandra Recio‐SaucedoChiara Dall’OraAntonello MaruottiJane Ball
- Journals
- BMJ Open (7 papers)Resuscitation (5 papers)Nucleic Acids Research (3 papers)Journal of Critical Care (3 papers)International Journal of Nursing Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaItaly
In The Last Decade
Oliver Redfern
54 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
- Research and Theory 165
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 56
- Emergency Medicine 393
- Emergency Medical Services 219
- General Health Professions 559
Countries citing papers authored by Oliver Redfern
This map shows the geographic impact of Oliver Redfern's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oliver Redfern with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oliver Redfern more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Oliver Redfern
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oliver Redfern. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oliver Redfern. The network helps show where Oliver Redfern may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Oliver Redfern, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 42 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 102 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 39 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 395 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 83 |
About Oliver Redfern
Oliver Redfern is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Emergency Medicine, Health Informatics, Medical Laboratory Technology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 57 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (14 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (11 papers), Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (10 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (8 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (6 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (6 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (6 papers) and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (165 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (56 citations), Emergency Medicine (393 citations), Emergency Medical Services (219 citations) and General Health Professions (559 citations). Oliver Redfern has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Christine Orengo, David Lee, Gary B. Smith, Peter Griffiths, Alejandra Recio‐Saucedo, Chiara Dall’Ora, Antonello Maruotti, Jane Ball, Paul Meredith and Jim Briggs. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Resuscitation, Nucleic Acids Research, Journal of Critical Care and International Journal of Nursing Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.