Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Oliver Krämer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oliver Krämer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oliver Krämer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oliver Krämer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oliver Krämer. The network helps show where Oliver Krämer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Oliver Krämer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Oliver Krämer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Oliver Krämer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Oliver Krämer. Oliver Krämer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Krämer, Oliver, et al.. (2018). Properties of adv-1 - Adversarials of Adversarials.. The European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks.2 indexed citations
4.
Heinermann, Justin & Oliver Krämer. (2015). On Heterogeneous Machine Learning Ensembles for Wind Power Prediction.. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.6 indexed citations
5.
Krämer, Oliver, et al.. (2015). Simulated Annealing With Parameter Tuning for Wind Turbine Placement Optimization.. LWA. 108–119.2 indexed citations
6.
Heinermann, Justin, et al.. (2015). Comparison of Numerical Models and Statistical Learning for Wind Speed Prediction.. The European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks.8 indexed citations
7.
Heinemann, Detlev, et al.. (2014). PV Power Predictions on Different Spatial and Temporal Scales Integrating PV Measurements, Satellite Data and Numerical Weather Predictions. 29th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition. 1–24.12 indexed citations
8.
Krämer, Oliver, et al.. (2014). An Evolutionary Approach to Geo-Planning of Renewable Energies. EnviroInfo. 501–508.2 indexed citations
9.
Krämer, Oliver, et al.. (2014). Wind Power Prediction with Cross-Correlation Weighted Nearest Neighbors. EnviroInfo. 63–68.2 indexed citations
10.
Krämer, Oliver, et al.. (2013). Machine Learning in Wind Energy Information Systems.. EnviroInfo. 16–24.1 indexed citations
11.
Polsterer, Kai, Fabian Gieseke, & Oliver Krämer. (2012). Galaxy Classification without Feature Extraction. 461. 561.
12.
Krämer, Oliver, et al.. (2012). Balancing Salience and Unobtrusiveness in Auditory Monitoring of Evolutionary Optimization. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 60. 531–539.1 indexed citations
Satzger, Benjamin, Oliver Krämer, & Jörg Lässig. (2010). Adaptive Heuristic Estimates for Automated Planning Using Regression.. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 576–581.1 indexed citations
15.
Krämer, Oliver, Benjamin Satzger, & Jörg Lässig. (2010). Managing Energy in a Virtual Power Plant Using Learning Classifier Systems.. 111–117.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.