Oliver Giudice
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Signal Processing
- Media Technology
- Neurology
- Co-authors
- Sebastiano BattiatoLuca GuarneraGiovanni Maria FarinellaA. ParatoreGiovanni PuglisiGiovanni GalloFilippo StancoAlessandro Ortis
- Topics
- Digital Media Forensic Detection (14 papers)Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis (8 papers)Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaIEEE AccessComputers in Biology and Medicine
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Oliver Giudice
32 papers receiving 369 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 272
- Artificial Intelligence 109
- Signal Processing 30
- Media Technology 21
- Neurology 21
Countries citing papers authored by Oliver Giudice
This map shows the geographic impact of Oliver Giudice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oliver Giudice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oliver Giudice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Oliver Giudice
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oliver Giudice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oliver Giudice. The network helps show where Oliver Giudice may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Oliver Giudice
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Oliver Giudice. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Oliver Giudice based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Oliver Giudice. Oliver Giudice is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 34 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 64 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | Institutional sector classifier, a machine learning approach | 1 |
| 15 | 80 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | Aligning Bags of Shape Contexts for Blurred Shape Model Based Symbol Classification | 2 |
About Oliver Giudice
Oliver Giudice is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Signal Processing, having authored 33 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Media Forensic Detection (14 papers), Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis (8 papers) and Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (272 citations), Health Informatics (5 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (109 citations). Oliver Giudice has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Sebastiano Battiato, Luca Guarnera, Giovanni Maria Farinella, A. Paratore, Giovanni Puglisi, Giovanni Gallo, Filippo Stanco, Alessandro Ortis, Dario Allegra and Francesco Pappalardo. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, IEEE Access and Computers in Biology and Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.