Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Large igneous provinces: Crustal structure, dimensions, and external consequences
19941.2k citationsMillard F. Coffin, Olav EldholmReviews of Geophysicsprofile →
Evolution of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea
1977580 citationsManik Talwani, Olav Eldholmprofile →
Structure and evolution of the continental margin off Norway and the Barents Sea
2008399 citationsJan Inge Faleide, Filippos Tsikalas et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Olav Eldholm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Olav Eldholm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Olav Eldholm more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Olav Eldholm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Olav Eldholm. The network helps show where Olav Eldholm may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Olav Eldholm
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Olav Eldholm.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Olav Eldholm based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Olav Eldholm. Olav Eldholm is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Coffin, Millard F., C. Neal, Bob Duncan, et al.. (2007). Large igneous province workshop. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
Faleide, Jan Inge, et al.. (2003). Late Mesozoic-Cenozoic Evolution of the NE Atlantic Region and Links to the Arctic. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2003.1 indexed citations
5.
Rey, S., Olav Eldholm, & Sverre Planke. (2003). Formation of the Jan Mayen Microcontinent, the Norwegian Sea. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2003.5 indexed citations
6.
Engen, Øyvind, Olav Eldholm, & H. Bungum. (2003). The Arctic plate boundary. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 108(B2).71 indexed citations
7.
Eldholm, Olav, Filippos Tsikalas, Jan Inge Faleide, & Eirik Sundvor. (2002). Crustal Configuration of the Lofoten-Vesterålen Volcanic Continental Margin off Norway. AGUFM. 2002.2 indexed citations
8.
Brozena, J. M., et al.. (2002). A New Aerogeophysical Study of the Eurasia Basin and Lomonosov Ridge: Implications for Basin Development. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU). 2002.1 indexed citations
Coffin, Millard F. & Olav Eldholm. (1994). Large igneous provinces: Crustal structure, dimensions, and external consequences. Reviews of Geophysics. 32(1). 1–36.1192 indexed citations breakdown →
Eldholm, Olav & L. Montadert. (1981). The Main Types of Passive Margins: An Introduction. Institutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea).1 indexed citations
18.
Talwani, Manik, John C. Mutter, & Olav Eldholm. (1981). The Initiation of Opening of the Norwegian Sea. Institutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea).17 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.