458 total citations 7 papers, 65 citations indexed
About
O. Koehler is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Ecology and Plant Science.
According to data from OpenAlex, O. Koehler has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 65 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Social Psychology, 2 papers in Ecology and 2 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in O. Koehler's work include Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (2 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (1 paper) and Human-Animal Interaction Studies (1 paper). O. Koehler is often cited by papers focused on Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (2 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (1 paper) and Human-Animal Interaction Studies (1 paper). O. Koehler collaborates with scholars based in Germany. O. Koehler's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal für Ornithologie, Acta Medica Scandinavica and Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie.
This map shows the geographic impact of O. Koehler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. Koehler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. Koehler more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. Koehler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. Koehler. The network helps show where O. Koehler may publish in the future.
1951·Journal für Ornithologie·(unknown),
(unknown),
(unknown),
O. Koehler
2
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.