Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Scalings for tokamak energy confinement
1990435 citationsO. Kardaun, J.G. Cordey et al.Nuclear Fusionprofile →
Scaling of the tokamak near the scrape-off layer H-mode power width and implications for ITER
2013431 citationsT. Eich, A.W. Leonard et al.Nuclear Fusionprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of O. Kardaun's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. Kardaun with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. Kardaun more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. Kardaun. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. Kardaun. The network helps show where O. Kardaun may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of O. Kardaun
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of O. Kardaun.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of O. Kardaun based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with O. Kardaun. O. Kardaun is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Eich, T., A.W. Leonard, R.A. Pitts, et al.. (2013). Scaling of the tokamak near the scrape-off layer H-mode power width and implications for ITER. Nuclear Fusion. 53(9). 93031–93031.431 indexed citations breakdown →
Kardaun, O.. (2005). Classical methods of statistics : with applications in fusion-oriented experimental plasma physics. Springer eBooks.
12.
Thomsen, K., J.G. Cordey, & O. Kardaun. (2004). Analysis of the bias in H-mode confinement scaling expressions related to measurement errors in variables. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society).1 indexed citations
13.
Mukhovatov, V., M. Shimada, A. N. Chudnovskiy, et al.. (2003). Overview of physics basis for ITER. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 45(12A). A235–A252.59 indexed citations
14.
Kardaun, O.. (2002). Interval estimate of the global energy confinement time during ELMy H-mode in ITER-FEAT, based on the international multi-tokamak ITERH.DB3 dataset. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society).4 indexed citations
15.
Stöber, J., O. Kardaun, F. Ryter, et al.. (1998). CONFINEMENT AND TRANSPORT STUDIES AT HIGH POWER IN ASDEX UPGRADE. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 476–479.1 indexed citations
16.
Kardaun, O.. (1995). Uncertainties in the confinement time prediction for ITER. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics.1 indexed citations
17.
Ryter, F., O. Gruber, O. Kardaun, et al.. (1992). Expression for the Thermal H-Mode Energy Confinement Time under ELM-free Conditions. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).2 indexed citations
Kardaun, O.. (1990). Scaling investigations and statistical profile analysis. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.