Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Formation of the Giant Planets by Concurrent Accretion of Solids and Gas
19961.8k citationsJames B. Pollack, O. Hubickyj et al.Icarusprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of O. Hubickyj's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. Hubickyj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. Hubickyj more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. Hubickyj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. Hubickyj. The network helps show where O. Hubickyj may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of O. Hubickyj
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of O. Hubickyj.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of O. Hubickyj based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with O. Hubickyj. O. Hubickyj is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
17 of 17 papers shown
1.
D’Angelo, Gennaro, Jack J. Lissauer, O. Hubickyj, & Peter Bodenheimer. (2008). Models of Jupiter's Growth Incorporating Thermal and Hydrodynamics Constraints. AGUFM. 2008.2 indexed citations
Marley, Mark S., Jonathan J. Fortney, O. Hubickyj, Peter Bodenheimer, & Jack J. Lissauer. (2007). On the Luminosity of Young Jupiters. The Astrophysical Journal. 655(1). 541–549.247 indexed citations
Hubickyj, O., Peter Bodenheimer, & Jack J. Lissauer. (2004). Evolution of Gas Giant Planets Using the Core Accretion Model. 22. 83–86.2 indexed citations
6.
Cabot, W., P. Cassen, James B. Pollack, V. M. Canuto, & O. Hubickyj. (2004). Direct Numerical Simulations of Turbulent Convection.2 indexed citations
7.
Hubickyj, O., Peter Bodenheimer, & Jack J. Lissauer. (2003). Small Core for Jupiter using the Core Instability Model. DPS.2 indexed citations
8.
Hubickyj, O., Peter Bodenheimer, & Jack J. Lissauer. (2002). Accumulation of Giant Planet Atmospheres Around Cores of a Few Earth Masses. AGUFM. 2002.1 indexed citations
9.
Hubickyj, O., Peter Bodenheimer, & Jack J. Lissauer. (2000). New Models for the Formation of Jupiter. 32.1 indexed citations
10.
Pollack, James B., O. Hubickyj, Peter Bodenheimer, et al.. (1996). Formation of the Giant Planets by Concurrent Accretion of Solids and Gas. Icarus. 124(1). 62–85.1765 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Pollack, J. B., M. Podolak, O. Hubickyj, et al.. (1990). Simulations of the Accretion of the Giant Planets. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 22. 1081.1 indexed citations
Cabot, W., V. M. Canuto, O. Hubickyj, & J. B. Pollack. (1987). The role of turbulent convection in the primitive solar nebula. I - Theory. II - Results. Icarus. 69.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.