Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by O. C. Zienkiewicz
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of O. C. Zienkiewicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. C. Zienkiewicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. C. Zienkiewicz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by O. C. Zienkiewicz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. C. Zienkiewicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. C. Zienkiewicz. The network helps show where O. C. Zienkiewicz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of O. C. Zienkiewicz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of O. C. Zienkiewicz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of O. C. Zienkiewicz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with O. C. Zienkiewicz. O. C. Zienkiewicz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Zienkiewicz, O. C. & Eugenio Oñate. (1992). Finite elements versus finite volumes. Is there really a choice?. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).3 indexed citations
5.
Ladevèze, Pierre & O. C. Zienkiewicz. (1992). New Advances in Computational Structural Mechanics: Proceedings of the European Conference on New Advances in Computational Structural Mechanics, Giens, France, 2-5 April 1991. Elsevier eBooks.6 indexed citations
6.
Zienkiewicz, O. C. & Robert L. Taylor. (1991). Solid and fluid mechanics dynamics and non-linearity. McGraw-Hill eBooks.63 indexed citations
Zienkiewicz, O. C. & P. Bettess. (1981). Fluid-structure dynamic interaction and some 'unified' approximation processes. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report A. 82. 119–145.1 indexed citations
12.
Pande, G. N., et al.. (1980). Soils under cyclic and transient loading : proceedings of the International Symposium on Soils under Cyclic and Transient Loading, Swansea, 7-11 January 1980.2 indexed citations
13.
Wood, W. L., et al.. (1980). An alpha modification of Newmark's method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 15(10). 1562–1566.422 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Zienkiewicz, O. C., et al.. (1978). Numerical methods in offshore engineering. Wiley eBooks.115 indexed citations
15.
Heinrich, J, et al.. (1978). Penalty function solution of coupled convective and conductive heat transfer. 935–946.8 indexed citations
Zienkiewicz, O. C. & Y.K. Cheung. (1967). The finite element method in structural and continuum mechanics, numerical solution of problems in structural and continuum mechanics. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne).20 indexed citations
20.
Zienkiewicz, O. C. & G. S. Holister. (1965). Stress analysis : recent developments in numerical and experimental methods. J. Wiley eBooks.16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.