Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Food variety and dietary diversity scores in children: are they good indicators of dietary adequacy?
2006534 citationsNP Steyn, Johanna H. Nel et al.Public Health Nutritionprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of NP Steyn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by NP Steyn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NP Steyn more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by NP Steyn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by NP Steyn. The network helps show where NP Steyn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of NP Steyn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of NP Steyn.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of NP Steyn based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with NP Steyn. NP Steyn is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Harris, Tess, et al.. (2019). How well are adolescents in the Gouda district of Western Cape meeting the South African food-based dietary guidelines for fat, sugar and sodium?.1 indexed citations
2.
Villiers, Anniza de, et al.. (2017). Food choices, physical activity levels and other factors associated with weight gain in primary school educators.1 indexed citations
Steyn, NP, Johanna H. Nel, Guy Nantel, Gina Kennedy, & Demetre Labadarios. (2006). Food variety and dietary diversity scores in children: are they good indicators of dietary adequacy?. Public Health Nutrition. 9(5). 644–650.534 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Grobbelaar, Antoinette A., et al.. (2004). Evaluation of usual dietary intake of women working on farms in The Koue Bokkeveld District and the potential benefits of maize and wheat fortification. 19(1). 12–17.3 indexed citations
Labadarios, Demetre, E. M. W. Maunder, NP Steyn, et al.. (2003). National food consumption survey in children aged 1-9 years: South Africa 1999.. PubMed. 56. 106–9.148 indexed citations
9.
Steyn, NP & Debbi Marais. (2002). Children have a right to meals of good nutritional quality and quantity at state-subsidised creches!. 15(2). 5–6.1 indexed citations
Steyn, NP, et al.. (2001). A survey of wild, green, leafy vegetables and their potential in combating micronutrient deficiencies in rural populations : research in action. South African Journal of Science. 97. 276–278.43 indexed citations
12.
Steyn, NP, J.J. Olivier, & Cebisa Noxolo Nesamvuni. (2001). A survey of wild, green, leafy vegetables and their potential in combating micronutrient deficiencies in rural populations.64 indexed citations
13.
Nesamvuni, Cebisa Noxolo, NP Steyn, & M.J. Potgieter. (2001). Nutritional value of wild, leafy plants consumed by the Vhavenda.67 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.