This map shows the geographic impact of Norway's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Norway with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norway more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Norway. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Norway. The network helps show where Norway may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Norway
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Norway.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Norway based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Norway. Norway is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Secretary-General, Un., Australia, Brazil, et al.. (2020). Reducing space threats through norms, rules and principles of responsible behaviours :.2 indexed citations
2.
Brazil, Canadá, Estonia, et al.. (2017). Global health and foreign policy : addressing the health of the most vulnerable for an inclusive society :.3 indexed citations
3.
Chile, Chile, Costa Rica, & Norway. (2013). Promoting international cooperation and strengthening capacity to combat the problem of transnational organized crime committed at sea.1 indexed citations
4.
Greece, Ireland, Norway, et al.. (2011). Human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity :.4 indexed citations
5.
Argentina, Bolívia, Egypt, et al.. (2010). Additional views on which the Chair may draw in preparing text to facilitate negotiations among Parties.2 indexed citations
6.
Norway, et al.. (2008). Business model performance Reflections from three studies of mobile data services. 2(1). 23–38.5 indexed citations
7.
Sweden, et al.. (2006). Child Rights Programming.4 indexed citations
8.
Australia, Belgium, Czech Republic, et al.. (2004). Responsibilities of transnational corporations and related business enterprises with regard to human rights.5 indexed citations
9.
Austria, Belgium, Brazil, et al.. (2003). Human rights and sexual orientation.7 indexed citations
10.
Australia, Azerbaijan, Bolívia, et al.. (2002). Third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.201 indexed citations
11.
Argentina, Australia, Austria, et al.. (1999). Development of public information activities in the field of human rights, including the World Public Information Campaign on Human Rights :.2 indexed citations
12.
Shenyang & Norway. (1990). Characteristics and Nature of Metal Fog in Molten Salts. Journal of Material Science and Technology. 6(3). 157.1 indexed citations
13.
Norway, et al.. (1962). The Constitution of Norway. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.