This map shows the geographic impact of Denmark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denmark more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denmark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denmark. The network helps show where Denmark may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denmark
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denmark.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denmark based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Denmark. Denmark is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Denmark. (2016). Letter dated 11 January 2016 from the Permanent Representative of Denmark to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council.1 indexed citations
3.
Herzegovina, Brazil, Cyprus, et al.. (2016). Consolidating gains and accelerating efforts to control and eliminate malaria in developing countries, particularly in Africa, by 2030 :.1 indexed citations
4.
Rica, Costa, Denmark, Croatia, et al.. (2012). Views on issues relating to agriculture.1 indexed citations
5.
Afghanistan, Australia, Bangladesh, et al.. (2011). Happiness : towards a holistic approach to development :.18 indexed citations
6.
Denmark. (2010). BalticSurvey - a study in the Baltic Sea countries of public attitudes and use of the sea.3 indexed citations
7.
Dirckinck‐Holmfeld, Lone & Denmark. (2009). Innovation of Problem Based Learning through ICT: Linking Local and Global Experiences. The International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (The University of the West Indies).12 indexed citations
8.
Sweden, et al.. (2006). Child Rights Programming.4 indexed citations
9.
Austria, Belgium, Brazil, et al.. (2003). Human rights and sexual orientation.7 indexed citations
10.
Australia, Azerbaijan, Bolívia, et al.. (2002). Third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.201 indexed citations
11.
Bolívia, Colombia, Denmark, & Perú. (2002). The role of alternative development in drug control and development cooperation.1 indexed citations
12.
Li, Lang, et al.. (2000). EFFECTS OF SPECIFIED BLANK SIZE ON BODY WRINKLING DURING HYDRODYNAMIC DEEP DRAWING OF TAPERED RECTANGULAR BOX. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters). 13(2). 476.3 indexed citations
13.
Denmark, et al.. (1999). The Danish criminal code : English version. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
14.
Secretary-General, Un., Denmark, Estonia, et al.. (1998). Human rights and arbitrary deprivation of nationality : report of the Secretary-General..4 indexed citations
15.
Denmark. (1989). Act No. 209 of 5 April 1989 amending the Marriage and Divorce Act.. PubMed. 16. 64–64.1 indexed citations
16.
Denmark. (1989). Act No. 372 of 7 June 1989 on registered partnerships.. PubMed. 16. 56–56.7 indexed citations
Peace & Denmark. (1980). Resolutions and decision adopted by the World Conference of United Nations Decade for Women : Equality, Development and Peace. United Nations eBooks.1 indexed citations
19.
Denmark, et al.. (1972). Dictionary of Scandinavian biography. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.