Noriko Ide-Iwata
About
In The Last Decade
Noriko Ide-Iwata
5 papers receiving 256 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Molecular Biology 181
- Surgery 132
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 48
- Genetics 29
- Immunology 25
Countries citing papers authored by Noriko Ide-Iwata
This map shows the geographic impact of Noriko Ide-Iwata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noriko Ide-Iwata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noriko Ide-Iwata more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Noriko Ide-Iwata
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noriko Ide-Iwata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noriko Ide-Iwata. The network helps show where Noriko Ide-Iwata may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Noriko Ide-Iwata
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Noriko Ide-Iwata. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Noriko Ide-Iwata based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Noriko Ide-Iwata. Noriko Ide-Iwata is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 67 | |
| 4 | 71 | |
| 5 | 88 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.