Norbert Schalast
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Kevin HowellsMick CollinsMatthew TonkinMichelle NewberryAmanda J. ClarkEamonn FergusonSteffan DaviesNorbert Leygraf
- Topics
- Criminal Law and Policy (12 papers)Psychiatric care and mental health services (11 papers)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Norbert Schalast
25 papers receiving 389 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Clinical Psychology 351
- Sociology and Political Science 164
- General Health Professions 89
- Social Psychology 87
- Psychiatry and Mental health 54
Countries citing papers authored by Norbert Schalast
This map shows the geographic impact of Norbert Schalast's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Norbert Schalast with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norbert Schalast more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Norbert Schalast
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Norbert Schalast. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Norbert Schalast. The network helps show where Norbert Schalast may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Norbert Schalast
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Norbert Schalast. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Norbert Schalast based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Norbert Schalast. Norbert Schalast is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | Anmerkungen zu den Plänen einer Änderung des Rechts der Unterbringung im psychiatrischen Krankenhaus | 3 |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 61 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 59 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | [Treatment motivation of patients admitted for substance abuse treatment according to the section 64 StGB regulation]. | 2 |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | Therapiemotivation im Massregelvollzug gemäss § 64 StGB: Patientenmerkmale, Rahmenbedingungen, Behandlungsverläufe | 1 |
About Norbert Schalast
Norbert Schalast is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 433 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Law and Policy (12 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (11 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (351 citations), Social Psychology (87 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (164 citations). Norbert Schalast has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Howells, Mick Collins, Matthew Tonkin, Michelle Newberry, Amanda J. Clark, Eamonn Ferguson, Steffan Davies, Norbert Leygraf, Heinrich Küfner and Udo Schneider. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Assessment, Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health and The Prison Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.