Norbert Schalast

665 total citations
25 papers, 433 citations indexed

About

Norbert Schalast is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Norbert Schalast has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 433 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Clinical Psychology, 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Norbert Schalast's work include Criminal Law and Policy (12 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (11 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (10 papers). Norbert Schalast is often cited by papers focused on Criminal Law and Policy (12 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (11 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (10 papers). Norbert Schalast collaborates with scholars based in Germany and United Kingdom. Norbert Schalast's co-authors include Kevin Howells, Mick Collins, Matthew Tonkin, Michelle Newberry, Amanda J. Clark, Eamonn Ferguson, Steffan Davies, Norbert Leygraf, Heinrich Küfner and Udo Schneider and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Assessment, Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health and The Prison Journal.

In The Last Decade

Norbert Schalast

25 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Norbert Schalast Germany 10 351 164 89 87 54 25 433
Matthew Tonkin United Kingdom 9 274 0.8× 127 0.8× 74 0.8× 70 0.8× 29 0.5× 12 347
Soma Ganesan Canada 11 262 0.7× 164 1.0× 94 1.1× 80 0.9× 71 1.3× 23 405
Adam D. Vaughan United States 9 181 0.5× 64 0.4× 84 0.9× 54 0.6× 29 0.5× 19 307
Samuel R. Weber United States 4 171 0.5× 128 0.8× 109 1.2× 97 1.1× 61 1.1× 5 412
Mari Anne Harty United Kingdom 11 346 1.0× 136 0.8× 82 0.9× 87 1.0× 156 2.9× 15 415
Husnara Khanom United Kingdom 7 189 0.5× 59 0.4× 98 1.1× 62 0.7× 102 1.9× 7 331
Natalie Bonfine United States 9 255 0.7× 87 0.5× 125 1.4× 125 1.4× 67 1.2× 28 363
Nadji Kahtan United Kingdom 11 503 1.4× 136 0.8× 60 0.7× 82 0.9× 125 2.3× 12 541
Zeliha Özlü-Erkilic Austria 11 297 0.8× 88 0.5× 77 0.9× 57 0.7× 14 0.3× 19 348
Jan Theunissen Netherlands 8 178 0.5× 34 0.2× 83 0.9× 86 1.0× 82 1.5× 17 296

Countries citing papers authored by Norbert Schalast

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Norbert Schalast's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Norbert Schalast with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norbert Schalast more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Norbert Schalast

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Norbert Schalast. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Norbert Schalast. The network helps show where Norbert Schalast may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Norbert Schalast

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Norbert Schalast. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Norbert Schalast based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Norbert Schalast. Norbert Schalast is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schalast, Norbert. (2021). Zur Debatte um die Reform der gesetzlichen Voraussetzungen einer Unterbringung in der Entziehungsanstalt. Forensische Psychiatrie Psychologie Kriminologie. 15(2). 179–187. 6 indexed citations
2.
Leygraf, Norbert, et al.. (2019). ADHS als Problem und Thema der Behandlung in der Entziehungsanstalt. Forensische Psychiatrie Psychologie Kriminologie. 13(3). 239–250. 1 indexed citations
3.
Schalast, Norbert, et al.. (2017). Psychometric Properties of the Essen Climate Evaluation Schema (EssenCES) in a Sample of General Psychiatric Wards. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 31(6). 582–587. 5 indexed citations
4.
Schalast, Norbert, et al.. (2017). Measuring Social Climate in German Prisons Using the Essen Climate Evaluation Schema. The Prison Journal. 97(2). 166–180. 10 indexed citations
5.
Schalast, Norbert, et al.. (2017). Zusammenhänge des Stationsklimas mit objektiven Rahmenbedingungen psychiatrischer Stationen. Psychiatrische Praxis. 45(5). 242–247. 12 indexed citations
6.
Schalast, Norbert. (2016). „Gefährdung Dritter als Rechtfertigung einer öffentlich-rechtlichen Unterbringung psychisch Kranker?“ – Pro. Psychiatrische Praxis. 43(1). 10–11. 3 indexed citations
7.
Schalast, Norbert & Michael Lindemann. (2015). Anmerkungen zu den Plänen einer Änderung des Rechts der Unterbringung im psychiatrischen Krankenhaus. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University). 33(2). 3 indexed citations
8.
Schalast, Norbert. (2013). Die Dauer der Unterbringung in der Entziehungsanstalt. Forensische Psychiatrie Psychologie Kriminologie. 7(2). 105–113. 5 indexed citations
9.
Tonkin, Matthew, Kevin Howells, Eamonn Ferguson, et al.. (2011). Lost in translation? Psychometric properties and construct validity of the English Essen Climate Evaluation Schema (EssenCES) social climate questionnaire.. Psychological Assessment. 24(3). 573–580. 61 indexed citations
10.
Schalast, Norbert, et al.. (2011). Dimensionale versus kategoriale Klassifikation von Persönlichkeitsstörungen. Forensische Psychiatrie Psychologie Kriminologie. 5(3). 145–153. 4 indexed citations
11.
Schalast, Norbert, et al.. (2010). Drei prognostisch und therapeutisch relevante Gruppen alkoholabhängiger Patienten im Maßregelvollzug gemäß § 64 StGB. Psychiatrische Praxis. 38(1). 31–37. 17 indexed citations
12.
Howells, Kevin, et al.. (2009). The EssenCES measure of social climate: A preliminary validation and normative data in UK high secure hospital settings. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health. 19(5). 308–320. 59 indexed citations
13.
Schalast, Norbert. (2009). Drogenabhängige Patienten im Maßregelvollzug gemäß § 64 StGB: Verbesserung der Quote erfolgreicher Behandlung durch suchtspezifische Medikation?. Forensische Psychiatrie Psychologie Kriminologie. 3(4). 294–301. 5 indexed citations
14.
Schalast, Norbert. (2008). SK-M, ein Kurzfragebogen zur Einschätzung des Stationsklimas im Maßregelvollzug. Psychiatrische Praxis. 35(4). 175–181. 10 indexed citations
15.
Schalast, Norbert, et al.. (2006). Patienten des Maßregelvollzugs gemäß § 63 StGB mit geringen Entlassungsaussichten. Forensische Psychiatrie Psychologie Kriminologie. 1(1). 34–42. 10 indexed citations
16.
Havemann‐Reinecke, Ursula, et al.. (2004). AWMF-Leitlinien: Postakutbehandlung bei Störungen durch Opioide. SUCHT - Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis / Journal of Addiction Research and Practice. 50(4). 226–257. 10 indexed citations
17.
Schalast, Norbert, et al.. (2003). Zur Unterbringung forensischer Patienten in der Allgemeinpsychiatrie. Der Nervenarzt. 74(3). 252–258. 1 indexed citations
18.
Schalast, Norbert. (2000). [Treatment motivation of patients admitted for substance abuse treatment according to the section 64 StGB regulation].. PubMed. 27(6). 270–6. 2 indexed citations
19.
Schalast, Norbert. (2000). Rückfälle während der Behandlung im Maßregelvollzug gemäß § 64 StGB. SUCHT - Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis / Journal of Addiction Research and Practice. 46(2). 111–120. 6 indexed citations
20.
Schalast, Norbert. (2000). Therapiemotivation im Massregelvollzug gemäss § 64 StGB: Patientenmerkmale, Rahmenbedingungen, Behandlungsverläufe. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026