Nola C. Rich
- Sensory Systems top 0.1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Speech and Hearing top 0.5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Neurology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Mario A. RuggeroLuis RoblesAlberto Recio‐SpinosoS. Shyamla NarayanAndrei N. TemchinBhagyalakshmi G. ShivapujaJohn A. CostalupesPeter A. Santi
- Topics
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (19 papers)Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (11 papers)Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (5 papers)
- Journals
- NatureJournal of NeurophysiologyPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Partner nations
- United StatesChile
In The Last Decade
Nola C. Rich
19 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Sensory Systems 1.6k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.6k
- Speech and Hearing 486
- Biomedical Engineering 459
- Neurology 281
Countries citing papers authored by Nola C. Rich
This map shows the geographic impact of Nola C. Rich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nola C. Rich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nola C. Rich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nola C. Rich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nola C. Rich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nola C. Rich. The network helps show where Nola C. Rich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nola C. Rich
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nola C. Rich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nola C. Rich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nola C. Rich. Nola C. Rich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72 | |
| 2 | 34 | |
| 3 | 152 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochleabreakdown → | 617 |
| 6 | 98 | |
| 7 | 50 | |
| 8 | 128 | |
| 9 | 113 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 100 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 269 | |
| 14 | 40 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 70 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 2 |
About Nola C. Rich
Nola C. Rich is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Developmental Biology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (19 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (11 papers) and Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (1.6k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.6k citations) and Speech and Hearing (486 citations). Nola C. Rich has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Mario A. Ruggero, Luis Robles, Alberto Recio‐Spinoso, S. Shyamla Narayan, Andrei N. Temchin, Bhagyalakshmi G. Shivapuja, John A. Costalupes and Peter A. Santi. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Neurophysiology and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.