Noémie Globus
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Oceanography
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Co-authors
- Amir LevinsonR. D. BlandfordDenis AllardOre GottliebGlennys R. FarrarD. M. PomaredeYehuda HoffmanTsvi Piran
- Topics
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (26 papers)Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (17 papers)Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (12 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelJapan
In The Last Decade
Noémie Globus
27 papers receiving 340 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 319
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 265
- Oceanography 9
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 7
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 5
Countries citing papers authored by Noémie Globus
This map shows the geographic impact of Noémie Globus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noémie Globus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noémie Globus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Noémie Globus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noémie Globus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noémie Globus. The network helps show where Noémie Globus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Noémie Globus
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Noémie Globus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Noémie Globus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Noémie Globus. Noémie Globus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Noémie Globus
Noémie Globus is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Geophysics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (26 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (17 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (319 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (265 citations) and Oceanography (9 citations). Noémie Globus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Amir Levinson, R. D. Blandford, Denis Allard, Ore Gottlieb, Glennys R. Farrar, D. M. Pomarede, Yehuda Hoffman, Tsvi Piran, Edoardo Carlesi and Anatoli Fedynitch. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.