Noëlle Hanoteau

766 total citations
7 papers, 602 citations indexed

About

Noëlle Hanoteau is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Noëlle Hanoteau has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 602 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Ophthalmology and 2 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Noëlle Hanoteau's work include Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers). Noëlle Hanoteau is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers). Noëlle Hanoteau collaborates with scholars based in France, Switzerland and Germany. Noëlle Hanoteau's co-authors include Klaus Pfizenmaier, Saddek Mohand‐Saïd, Ulrich Eisel, Céline Fuchs, Valérie Fontaine, José‐Alain Sahel, Manuel Simonutti, Serge Picaud, Gabrielle Rudolf and Astrid Nehlig and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Annals of Neurology and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

In The Last Decade

Noëlle Hanoteau

7 papers receiving 592 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Noëlle Hanoteau France	6	229	177	168	118	118	7	602
John Dodge United States	10	190 0.8×	125 0.7×	196 1.2×	56 0.5×	47 0.4×	11	536
M. Salinas‐Navarro Spain	9	577 2.5×	241 1.4×	250 1.5×	51 0.4×	420 3.6×	25	903
Katharine J. Liang United States	10	278 1.2×	533 3.0×	168 1.0×	149 1.3×	289 2.4×	14	904
Yosuke M. Morizawa Japan	9	167 0.7×	357 2.0×	175 1.0×	118 1.0×	25 0.2×	11	660
Anke H. W. Essing Netherlands	11	332 1.4×	114 0.6×	163 1.0×	34 0.3×	135 1.1×	13	602
Ephraim F. Trakhtenberg United States	14	504 2.2×	83 0.5×	342 2.0×	47 0.4×	118 1.0×	26	796
Ibrahim Malik United States	10	411 1.8×	143 0.8×	198 1.2×	20 0.2×	38 0.3×	17	640
Kazuhide Yoshida Japan	16	284 1.2×	100 0.6×	205 1.2×	72 0.6×	42 0.4×	35	780
Robert J. Courtney United States	12	302 1.3×	161 0.9×	90 0.5×	37 0.3×	289 2.4×	22	702
Akiko Takeda Japan	9	192 0.8×	79 0.4×	72 0.4×	28 0.2×	53 0.4×	22	401

Countries citing papers authored by Noëlle Hanoteau

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noëlle Hanoteau's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noëlle Hanoteau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noëlle Hanoteau more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noëlle Hanoteau

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noëlle Hanoteau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noëlle Hanoteau. The network helps show where Noëlle Hanoteau may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Noëlle Hanoteau

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Noëlle Hanoteau. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Noëlle Hanoteau based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Noëlle Hanoteau. Noëlle Hanoteau is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Stumm, Michael, et al.. (2012). Validation of a Postfixation Tissue Storage and Transport Medium to Preserve Histopathology and Molecular Pathology Analyses (Total and Phosphoactivated Proteins, and FISH). American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 137(3). 429–436. 8 indexed citations

2.

Hanoteau, Noëlle, Manuel Simonutti, Gabrielle Rudolf, et al.. (2004). Vigabatrin, the GABA‐transaminase inhibitor, damages cone photoreceptors in rats. Annals of Neurology. 55(5). 695–705. 54 indexed citations

3.

Hanoteau, Noëlle, et al.. (2004). Vigabatrin, the gaba-transaminase inhibitor, damages cone photoreceptors in rats. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 138(3). 516–516. 1 indexed citations

4.

Porto, Fernanda Belga Ottoni, Isabelle Perrault, David G. Hicks, et al.. (2003). Prenatal human ocular degeneration occurs in Leber's Congenital Amaurosis (LCA1 and 2).. PubMed. 533. 59–68. 10 indexed citations

5.

Fontaine, Sharon La, et al.. (2002). Neurodegenerative and neuroprotective effects of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in retinal ischemia. Journal of Neuroscience. 22(7). 1–7. 15 indexed citations

6.

Fontaine, Valérie, Saddek Mohand‐Saïd, Noëlle Hanoteau, et al.. (2002). Neurodegenerative and Neuroprotective Effects of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) in Retinal Ischemia: Opposite Roles of TNF Receptor 1 and TNF Receptor 2. Journal of Neuroscience. 22(7). RC216–RC216. 475 indexed citations

7.

Porto, Fernanda Belga Ottoni, Isabelle Perrault, David Hicks, et al.. (2002). Prenatal human ocular degeneration occurs in Leber's congenital amaurosis (LCA2). The Journal of Gene Medicine. 4(4). 390–396. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact