Noelle D. Dwyer
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cell Biology top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Aging top 0.2%
- Genetics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Cornelia I. BargmannJay L. BrewsterMichael C. GustinEdward WinterEmily R. TroemelHeather ColbertJoseph ChouPiali Sengupta
- Topics
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (9 papers)Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (7 papers)Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandAustria
In The Last Decade
Noelle D. Dwyer
24 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Molecular Biology 1.8k
- Cell Biology 678
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 618
- Aging 559
- Genetics 518
Countries citing papers authored by Noelle D. Dwyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Noelle D. Dwyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noelle D. Dwyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noelle D. Dwyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Noelle D. Dwyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noelle D. Dwyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noelle D. Dwyer. The network helps show where Noelle D. Dwyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Noelle D. Dwyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Noelle D. Dwyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Noelle D. Dwyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Noelle D. Dwyer. Noelle D. Dwyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | 57 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 106 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 75 | |
| 15 | 140 | |
| 16 | 103 | |
| 17 | 208 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | Divergent seven transmembrane receptors are candidate chemosensory receptors in C. elegansbreakdown → | 566 |
| 20 | An Osmosensing Signal Transduction Pathway in Yeastbreakdown → | 1059 |
About Noelle D. Dwyer
Noelle D. Dwyer is a scholar working on Aging, Developmental Neuroscience and Cell Biology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (9 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (7 papers) and Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (559 citations), Sensory Systems (261 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (333 citations). Noelle D. Dwyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Cornelia I. Bargmann, Jay L. Brewster, Michael C. Gustin, Edward Winter, Emily R. Troemel, Heather Colbert, Joseph Chou, Piali Sengupta, Dennis D.M. O’Leary and Lesilee S. Rose. Their work appears in journals such as Science, New England Journal of Medicine and Cell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.