Noe Woods

596 total citations
11 papers, 453 citations indexed

About

Noe Woods is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Noe Woods has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 453 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 3 papers in General Health Professions and 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Noe Woods's work include Climate Change and Health Impacts (9 papers), Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management (3 papers) and Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism (1 paper). Noe Woods is often cited by papers focused on Climate Change and Health Impacts (9 papers), Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management (3 papers) and Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism (1 paper). Noe Woods collaborates with scholars based in United States. Noe Woods's co-authors include Cassandra L. Thiel, Melissa M. Bilec, Amy E. Landis, Nicole Campion, Pamela Moalli, Megan S. Bradley and Leslie A. Meyn and has published in prestigious journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Journal of Cleaner Production and American Journal of Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Noe Woods

10 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Noe Woods United States 6 327 168 143 59 43 11 453
Frances Mortimer United Kingdom 14 487 1.5× 343 2.0× 176 1.2× 93 1.6× 32 0.7× 21 727
Richard Boyd United Kingdom 4 497 1.5× 274 1.6× 103 0.7× 111 1.9× 35 0.8× 4 664
Scott O. Shrake United States 6 200 0.6× 108 0.6× 80 0.6× 37 0.6× 19 0.4× 9 327
Ingeborg Steinbach United Kingdom 7 347 1.1× 167 1.0× 109 0.8× 55 0.9× 32 0.7× 14 465
Sonia Roschnik United Kingdom 6 454 1.4× 259 1.5× 73 0.5× 94 1.6× 31 0.7× 8 586
Emily Senay United States 6 395 1.2× 247 1.5× 86 0.6× 90 1.5× 48 1.1× 14 523
Richard Guido United States 6 199 0.6× 109 0.6× 98 0.7× 31 0.5× 19 0.4× 11 403
Antonella Bena Italy 15 122 0.4× 126 0.8× 73 0.5× 19 0.3× 33 0.8× 62 654
Nicolaas H. Sperna Weiland Netherlands 11 132 0.4× 52 0.3× 51 0.4× 17 0.3× 40 0.9× 36 321
Josh Karliner Australia 5 201 0.6× 101 0.6× 57 0.4× 44 0.7× 12 0.3× 6 325

Countries citing papers authored by Noe Woods

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noe Woods's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noe Woods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noe Woods more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noe Woods

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noe Woods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noe Woods. The network helps show where Noe Woods may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Noe Woods

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Noe Woods. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Noe Woods based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Noe Woods. Noe Woods is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Meyn, Leslie A., et al.. (2024). Green Cystoscopy: Does Minimizing the Use of Drapes Increase Infection Rates?. Urogynecology. 31(11). 1024–1032. 1 indexed citations
2.
Woods, Noe, et al.. (2024). Waste not want not: the story of surgical trash. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 36(6). 444–449. 2 indexed citations
3.
Woods, Noe, et al.. (2024). The Use of Disposable Supplies: Measuring Suburethral Sling Surgical Waste by Cost and Weight. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 79(6). 329–331.
4.
Woods, Noe, et al.. (2023). Going green in gynecology: a call to action. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 229(3). 269–274. 10 indexed citations
5.
Woods, Noe, et al.. (2023). The Use of Disposable Supplies: Measuring Suburethral Sling Surgical Waste by Cost and Weight. Urogynecology. 30(2). 132–137. 5 indexed citations
6.
Thiel, Cassandra L., Noe Woods, & Melissa M. Bilec. (2018). Strategies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Laparoscopic Surgery. American Journal of Public Health. 108(S2). S158–S164. 149 indexed citations
7.
Thiel, Cassandra L., et al.. (2017). Attitude of US obstetricians and gynaecologists to global warming and medical waste. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 22(3). 162–167. 40 indexed citations
8.
Campion, Nicole, et al.. (2015). Sustainable healthcare and environmental life-cycle impacts of disposable supplies: a focus on disposable custom packs. Journal of Cleaner Production. 94. 46–55. 129 indexed citations
9.
Campion, Nicole, et al.. (2012). Life cycle assessment perspectives on delivering an infant in the US. The Science of The Total Environment. 425. 191–198. 113 indexed citations
10.
Thiel, Cassandra L., et al.. (2012). Life cycle assessment of medical procedures: Vaginal and cesarean section births. 1–4. 3 indexed citations
11.
Bilec, Melissa M., Amy E. Landis, Cassandra L. Thiel, & Noe Woods. (2012). Using LCA in Healthcare: Focus on Hysterectomy Surgeries. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026