Amy E. Landis

6.3k total citations
136 papers, 4.6k citations indexed

About

Amy E. Landis is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Building and Construction and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy E. Landis has authored 136 papers receiving a total of 4.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Environmental Engineering, 28 papers in Building and Construction and 25 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Amy E. Landis's work include Environmental Impact and Sustainability (34 papers), Sustainable Building Design and Assessment (22 papers) and Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (15 papers). Amy E. Landis is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Impact and Sustainability (34 papers), Sustainable Building Design and Assessment (22 papers) and Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (15 papers). Amy E. Landis collaborates with scholars based in United States, Thailand and United Kingdom. Amy E. Landis's co-authors include Melissa M. Bilec, Troy A. Hottle, Kullapa Soratana, Laura Schaefer, Cassandra L. Thiel, William O. Collinge, Alex K. Jones, Thomas L. Theis, Shelie A. Miller and Braden Allenby and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Environmental Science & Technology and Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Amy E. Landis

130 papers receiving 4.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amy E. Landis United States 38 1.1k 750 690 682 659 136 4.6k
Roland Hischier Switzerland 36 1.8k 1.7× 762 1.0× 572 0.8× 689 1.0× 441 0.7× 100 5.8k
L. Reijnders Netherlands 42 1.3k 1.3× 680 0.9× 698 1.0× 935 1.4× 118 0.2× 131 6.1k
Paul Behrens Netherlands 34 1.1k 1.0× 348 0.5× 1.7k 2.5× 243 0.4× 496 0.8× 92 4.5k
Gregory Peters Sweden 41 1.8k 1.7× 629 0.8× 715 1.0× 258 0.4× 226 0.3× 128 6.5k
Michiel C. Zijp Netherlands 18 1.4k 1.3× 503 0.7× 638 0.9× 330 0.5× 106 0.2× 25 4.0k
Jinglan Hong China 44 2.1k 2.0× 900 1.2× 860 1.2× 699 1.0× 136 0.2× 149 5.9k
Sébastien Humbert Switzerland 22 2.1k 2.0× 691 0.9× 573 0.8× 274 0.4× 142 0.2× 35 4.2k
Alexis Laurent Denmark 38 2.0k 1.9× 882 1.2× 830 1.2× 334 0.5× 174 0.3× 103 5.8k
Rosalie van Zelm Netherlands 35 2.5k 2.4× 620 0.8× 927 1.3× 515 0.8× 145 0.2× 89 6.5k
Morten Birkved Denmark 43 1.6k 1.5× 1.3k 1.7× 672 1.0× 561 0.8× 110 0.2× 139 5.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Amy E. Landis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy E. Landis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy E. Landis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy E. Landis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy E. Landis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy E. Landis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy E. Landis. The network helps show where Amy E. Landis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy E. Landis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy E. Landis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy E. Landis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy E. Landis. Amy E. Landis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Harris, Chioke, Janet Reyna, Anthony Fontanini, et al.. (2025). Achieving equitable widespread residential building electrification – examining barriers, strategies, and opportunities using Los Angeles as a case study. Applied Energy. 384. 125498–125498.
2.
Landis, Amy E., et al.. (2024). Innovations in pavement design and engineering: A 2023 sustainability review. Heliyon. 10(13). e33602–e33602. 12 indexed citations
3.
Costello, Christine, et al.. (2023). Potential of existing strategies to reduce net anthropogenic inputs of phosphorus to land in the United States. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 15005–15005. 1 indexed citations
4.
Chen-Glasser, Melodie, Amy E. Landis, & Steven C. DeCaluwe. (2023). Carbon footprint of Li-Oxygen batteries and the impact of material and structure selection. Journal of Energy Storage. 60. 106684–106684. 11 indexed citations
5.
Costello, Christine, et al.. (2022). Phosphorus (P) in animal diets as a driver of embodied P in animal products and net anthropogenic P inputs. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 26(3). 1123–1135. 6 indexed citations
6.
Landis, Amy E., et al.. (2020). Life Cycle Assessment: A Tool to Help Design Environmentally Sustainable Space Technologies. 1–11. 6 indexed citations
7.
Landis, Amy E., Melissa M. Bilec, Leidy Klotz, & Annie R. Pearce. (2020). Lessons Learned from a Distance Learning Research Methods Course Co-Taught by Clemson, University of Pittsburgh, and Virginia Tech. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 22.1008.1–22.1008.12.
8.
Clark, Renee, et al.. (2017). Developing a framework to better engage students in STEM via game design: Findings from year 1. 4 indexed citations
9.
Landis, Amy E., et al.. (2017). Enhancing anaerobic digestion of food waste through biochemical methane potential assays at different substrate: inoculum ratios. Waste Management. 71. 612–617. 111 indexed citations
10.
Hasik, Vaclav, N. Anderson, William O. Collinge, et al.. (2016). Evaluating the Life Cycle Environmental Benefits and Trade-Offs of Water Reuse Systems for Net-Zero Buildings. Environmental Science & Technology. 51(3). 1110–1119. 42 indexed citations
11.
Campion, Nicole, et al.. (2015). Sustainable healthcare and environmental life-cycle impacts of disposable supplies: a focus on disposable custom packs. Journal of Cleaner Production. 94. 46–55. 129 indexed citations
12.
Soratana, Kullapa, William J. Barr, & Amy E. Landis. (2014). Effects of co-products on the life-cycle impacts of microalgal biodiesel. Bioresource Technology. 159. 157–166. 35 indexed citations
13.
Soratana, Kullapa, et al.. (2014). The role of sustainability and life cycle thinking in U.S. biofuels policies. Energy Policy. 75. 316–326. 16 indexed citations
14.
Landis, Amy E., et al.. (2013). Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 17(5). 777–788. 35 indexed citations
15.
Walker, Michael E., et al.. (2013). Life cycle costs to treat secondary municipal wastewater for reuse in cooling systems. Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination. 3(3). 224–238. 8 indexed citations
16.
Campion, Nicole, et al.. (2012). Life cycle assessment perspectives on delivering an infant in the US. The Science of The Total Environment. 425. 191–198. 113 indexed citations
17.
Soratana, Kullapa & Amy E. Landis. (2011). Evaluating industrial symbiosis and algae cultivation from a life cycle perspective. Bioresource Technology. 102(13). 6892–6901. 84 indexed citations
18.
Bilec, Melissa M., et al.. (2011). Using an LCA approach to evaluate green labels. 11. 1–3. 4 indexed citations
19.
20.
Miller, Shelie A., et al.. (2007). A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Petroleum and Soybean-Based Lubricants. Environmental Science & Technology. 41(11). 4143–4149. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026