Noah Sennett

692 total citations
9 papers, 452 citations indexed

About

Noah Sennett is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography and Ocean Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Noah Sennett has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 452 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2 papers in Oceanography and 2 papers in Ocean Engineering. Recurrent topics in Noah Sennett's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (9 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (6 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (4 papers). Noah Sennett is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (9 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (6 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (4 papers). Noah Sennett collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Noah Sennett's co-authors include Alessandra Buonanno, Jan Steinhoff, Tanja Hinderer, Serguei Ossokine, Lijing Shao, Sylvain Marsat, Norbert Wex, M. Krämer, Mohammed Khalil and Leonardo Senatore and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical review. D and Physical Review X.

In The Last Decade

Noah Sennett

9 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Noah Sennett Germany	9	441	181	62	30	21	9	452
Miguel Bezares Italy	10	455 1.0×	200 1.1×	59 1.0×	32 1.1×	10 0.5×	20	465
D. Baskaran United Kingdom	12	435 1.0×	166 0.9×	76 1.2×	19 0.6×	11 0.5×	15	443
Zack Carson United States	9	291 0.7×	123 0.7×	52 0.8×	36 1.2×	43 2.0×	10	308
Deyan P. Mihaylov United Kingdom	9	316 0.7×	82 0.5×	64 1.0×	20 0.7×	36 1.7×	15	332
Raissa F. P. Mendes Brazil	11	267 0.6×	90 0.5×	63 1.0×	27 0.9×	19 0.9×	19	279
K. Lazaridis Germany	5	325 0.7×	80 0.4×	76 1.2×	29 1.0×	32 1.5×	7	328
José D. V. Arbañil Brazil	10	264 0.6×	133 0.7×	54 0.9×	17 0.6×	23 1.1×	19	272
A. Vajpeyi Australia	5	345 0.8×	78 0.4×	50 0.8×	18 0.6×	45 2.1×	10	362
Nils Siemonsen Canada	11	391 0.9×	276 1.5×	28 0.5×	59 2.0×	11 0.5×	16	434
Elisa Maggio Italy	9	387 0.9×	235 1.3×	18 0.3×	38 1.3×	21 1.0×	13	406

Countries citing papers authored by Noah Sennett

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noah Sennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah Sennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah Sennett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noah Sennett

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah Sennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah Sennett. The network helps show where Noah Sennett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Noah Sennett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Noah Sennett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Noah Sennett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Noah Sennett. Noah Sennett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Mehta, A. K., Alessandra Buonanno, R. Cotesta, et al.. (2023). Tests of general relativity with gravitational-wave observations using a flexible theory-independent method. Physical review. D. 107(4). 46 indexed citations

2.

Sennett, Noah, Richard Brito, Alessandra Buonanno, V. Gorbenko, & Leonardo Senatore. (2020). Gravitational-wave constraints on an effective-field-theory extension of general relativity. Physical review. D. 102(4). 52 indexed citations

3.

Khalil, Mohammed, Noah Sennett, Jan Steinhoff, & Alessandra Buonanno. (2019). Theory-agnostic framework for dynamical scalarization of compact binaries. Physical review. D. 100(12). 20 indexed citations

4.

Khalil, Mohammed, Noah Sennett, Jan Steinhoff, Justin Vines, & Alessandra Buonanno. (2018). Hairy binary black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theory and their effective-one-body description. Physical review. D. 98(10). 33 indexed citations

5.

Sennett, Noah, Lijing Shao, & Jan Steinhoff. (2017). Effective action model of dynamically scalarizing binary neutron stars. Physical review. D. 96(8). 22 indexed citations

6.

Shao, Lijing, Noah Sennett, Alessandra Buonanno, M. Krämer, & Norbert Wex. (2017). Constraining Nonperturbative Strong-Field Effects in Scalar-Tensor Gravity by Combining Pulsar Timing and Laser-Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Detectors. Physical Review X. 7(4). 74 indexed citations

7.

Sennett, Noah, Tanja Hinderer, Jan Steinhoff, Alessandra Buonanno, & Serguei Ossokine. (2017). Distinguishing boson stars from black holes and neutron stars from tidal interactions in inspiraling binary systems. Physical review. D. 96(2). 114 indexed citations

8.

Sennett, Noah & Alessandra Buonanno. (2016). Modeling dynamical scalarization with a resummed post-Newtonian expansion. Physical review. D. 93(12). 35 indexed citations

9.

Sennett, Noah, Sylvain Marsat, & Alessandra Buonanno. (2016). Gravitational waveforms in scalar-tensor gravity at 2PN relative order. Physical review. D. 94(8). 56 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact