Nirmal Raj
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 2%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Oceanography
- Co-authors
- Joseph BramanteDavid McKeenPhilip TañedoHai-Bo YuDjuna CroonA. JoglekarMaxim PospelovTim Linden
- Topics
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (37 papers)Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (18 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (17 papers)
- Cited by
- Nuclear and High Energy PhysicsAstronomy and AstrophysicsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaIndia
In The Last Decade
Nirmal Raj
42 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.1k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 904
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 307
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 43
- Oceanography 30
Countries citing papers authored by Nirmal Raj
This map shows the geographic impact of Nirmal Raj's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nirmal Raj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nirmal Raj more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nirmal Raj
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nirmal Raj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nirmal Raj. The network helps show where Nirmal Raj may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nirmal Raj
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nirmal Raj. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nirmal Raj based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nirmal Raj. Nirmal Raj is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 53 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 94 | |
| 15 | 43 | |
| 16 | 128 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 43 |
About Nirmal Raj
Nirmal Raj is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (37 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (18 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.1k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (904 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (307 citations). Nirmal Raj has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and India. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Bramante, David McKeen, Philip Tañedo, Hai-Bo Yu, Djuna Croon, A. Joglekar, Maxim Pospelov, Tim Linden, Masha Baryakhtar and Shirley Weishi Li. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Reports and Physics Letters B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.