Nina S. Bradley

721 total citations
34 papers, 533 citations indexed

About

Nina S. Bradley is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Nina S. Bradley has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 533 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 papers in Social Psychology and 9 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Nina S. Bradley's work include Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (7 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (7 papers) and Congenital heart defects research (6 papers). Nina S. Bradley is often cited by papers focused on Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (7 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (7 papers) and Congenital heart defects research (6 papers). Nina S. Bradley collaborates with scholars based in United States, Spain and Canada. Nina S. Bradley's co-authors include Judith Lee Smith, Erhan Öztop, Anne Bekoff, Young Uk Ryu, Jaime R. Villablanca, Maja J. Matarić, Naomi T. Fitter, Barbara Sargent, Beth A. Smith and John C. Lin and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Neurophysiology and Journal of Biomechanics.

In The Last Decade

Nina S. Bradley

33 papers receiving 505 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nina S. Bradley United States	14	154	141	105	86	84	34	533
Anne Bekoff United States	19	231 1.5×	156 1.1×	148 1.4×	270 3.1×	365 4.3×	25	1.1k
David Hothersall United States	14	125 0.8×	103 0.7×	81 0.8×	21 0.2×	44 0.5×	26	584
Nanna Marie Lind Denmark	14	194 1.3×	88 0.6×	34 0.3×	23 0.3×	160 1.9×	20	960
R. M. Bradley United States	19	153 1.0×	70 0.5×	280 2.7×	11 0.1×	161 1.9×	32	1.2k
Jessy Lauer France	6	78 0.5×	84 0.6×	76 0.7×	61 0.7×	35 0.4×	13	499
Anette Moustgaard Denmark	10	123 0.8×	71 0.5×	28 0.3×	10 0.1×	120 1.4×	15	636
Jeanette Hellgren Sweden	6	316 2.1×	66 0.5×	89 0.8×	184 2.1×	93 1.1×	6	699
Roberto Bermejo United States	15	667 4.3×	94 0.7×	103 1.0×	49 0.6×	50 0.6×	23	1.0k
Bruno Preilowski Germany	8	557 3.6×	80 0.6×	56 0.5×	23 0.3×	27 0.3×	13	751
Donald Ganchrow Israel	18	89 0.6×	17 0.1×	94 0.9×	36 0.4×	96 1.1×	39	742

Countries citing papers authored by Nina S. Bradley

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina S. Bradley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina S. Bradley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina S. Bradley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina S. Bradley

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina S. Bradley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina S. Bradley. The network helps show where Nina S. Bradley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina S. Bradley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina S. Bradley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina S. Bradley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina S. Bradley. Nina S. Bradley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Winstein, Carolee J., et al.. (2025). Infants Display Anticipatory Gaze During a Motor Contingency Paradigm. Sensors. 25(3). 844–844.

Bradley, Nina S., et al.. (2022). Quantification of reactive arm responses to a slip perturbation. Journal of Biomechanics. 133. 110967–110967. 7 indexed citations

Bradley, Nina S., et al.. (2019). Toward an Understanding of Infant Behavior Changes During Contingent Learning With a Humanoid Robot. 1 indexed citations

Fitter, Naomi T., et al.. (2019). Using a Socially Assistive Humanoid Robot to Encourage Infant Leg Motion Training. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine. 3 indexed citations

Fitter, Naomi T., et al.. (2018). A Data Collection on the Visual, Physical, and Behavioral Reactions of an Infant to a Small Humanoid Robot. 1 indexed citations

Baker, Lucinda L., et al.. (2017). Ankle muscle tenotomy does not alter ankle flexor muscle recruitment bias during locomotor‐related repetitive limb movement in late‐stage chick embryos. Developmental Psychobiology. 60(2). 150–164. 1 indexed citations

Bradley, Nina S., et al.. (2012). Light Accelerates Morphogenesis and Acquisition of Interlimb Stepping in Chick Embryos. PLoS ONE. 7(12). e51348–e51348. 11 indexed citations

Bradley, Nina S., et al.. (2010). Kinematic analysis of overground locomotion in chicks incubated under different light conditions. Developmental Psychobiology. 52(8). 802–812. 12 indexed citations

Ryu, Young Uk & Nina S. Bradley. (2009). Precocious Locomotor Behavior Begins in the Egg: Development of Leg Muscle Patterns for Stepping in the Chick. PLoS ONE. 4(7). e6111–e6111. 16 indexed citations

10.

Bradley, Nina S., Young Uk Ryu, & John C. Lin. (2008). Fast Locomotor Burst Generation in Late Stage Embryonic Motility. Journal of Neurophysiology. 99(4). 1733–1742. 11 indexed citations

11.

Bradley, Nina S., et al.. (2005). Limb Movements During Embryonic Development in the Chick: Evidence for a Continuum in Limb Motor Control Antecedent to Locomotion. Journal of Neurophysiology. 94(6). 4401–4411. 16 indexed citations

12.

Öztop, Erhan, et al.. (2004). Infant grasp learning: a computational model. Experimental Brain Research. 158(4). 480–503. 92 indexed citations

13.

Bradley, Nina S., et al.. (2000). Ankle Restraint Modifies Motility at E12 in Chick Embryos. Journal of Neurophysiology. 83(1). 431–440. 18 indexed citations

14.

Bradley, Nina S.. (1997). Reduction in Buoyancy Alters Parameters of Motility in E9 Chick Embryos. Physiology & Behavior. 62(3). 591–595. 16 indexed citations

15.

Bradley, Nina S., et al.. (1995). Kinematic analysis of wing and leg movements for type I motility in E9 chick embryos. Experimental Brain Research. 103(2). 218–26. 20 indexed citations

16.

Orosz, Michael, et al.. (1994). Correcting two-dimensional kinematic errors for chick embryonic movements in ovo. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 24(4). 305–314. 8 indexed citations

17.

Bradley, Nina S. & Anne Bekoff. (1992). Development of coordinated movement in chicks: II. Temporal analysis of hindlimb muscle synergies at embryonic day 10 in embryos with spinal gap transections. Journal of Neurobiology. 23(4). 420–432. 22 indexed citations

18.

Bradley, Nina S. & Anne Bekoff. (1990). Development of coordinated movement in chicks: I. Temporal analysis of hindlimb muscle synergies at embryonic days 9 and 10. Developmental Psychobiology. 23(8). 763–782. 36 indexed citations

19.

Bradley, Nina S. & Judith Lee Smith. (1988). Neuromuscular patterns of stereotypic hindlimb behaviors in the first two postnatal months. II. Stepping in spinal kittens. Developmental Brain Research. 38(1). 53–67. 55 indexed citations

20.

Bradley, Nina S. & Judith Lee Smith. (1988). Neuromuscular patterns of stereotypic hindlimb behaviors in the first two postnatal months. I. Stepping in normal kittens. Developmental Brain Research. 38(1). 37–52. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact