Nina Ohlson
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
-
- Hormonal and reproductive studies
Papers in
-
- Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors 3
- Hormonal and reproductive studies 2
-
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment 3
- Co-authors
- Anders BerghPernilla WikströmPär StattinEva LundinAnnika IdahlAnne Zeleniuch‐JacquotteAlan A. ArslanKaren L. Koenig
- Journals
- The Prostate (4 papers)Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (1 paper)British Journal of Cancer (1 paper)European Urology (1 paper)Cytokine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwedenUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Nina Ohlson
13 papers receiving 403 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Reproductive Medicine 82
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 78
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 33
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 133
- Cancer Research 60
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Ohlson
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Ohlson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Ohlson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Ohlson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Ohlson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Ohlson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Ohlson. The network helps show where Nina Ohlson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nina Ohlson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 44 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 52 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 89 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 30 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 41 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 62 |
About Nina Ohlson
Nina Ohlson is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Reproductive Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Microbiology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (5 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (3 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (3 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers), Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (2 papers), Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (82 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (78 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (33 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (133 citations) and Cancer Research (60 citations). Nina Ohlson has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Anders Bergh, Pernilla Wikström, Pär Stattin, Eva Lundin, Annika Idahl, Anne Zeleniuch‐Jacquotte, Alan A. Arslan, Karen L. Koenig, Adele Marrangoni and Anna Lokshin. Their work appears in journals such as The Prostate, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, British Journal of Cancer, European Urology and Cytokine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.