Nina Ghosh
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Internal Medicine top 5%
- Surgery
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Haissam HaddadChi-Ming ChowPaul DorianRaymond YeeAndrew D. KrahnGeorge J. KleinAllan C. SkanesChristine Derzko
- Topics
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (8 papers)Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (6 papers)Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Internal MedicineCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nina Ghosh
25 papers receiving 352 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 247
- Internal Medicine 67
- Surgery 65
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 64
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 50
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Ghosh
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Ghosh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Ghosh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Ghosh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Ghosh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Ghosh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Ghosh. The network helps show where Nina Ghosh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Ghosh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Ghosh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Ghosh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Ghosh. Nina Ghosh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 38 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Nina Ghosh
Nina Ghosh is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (8 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (6 papers) and Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (67 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (247 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (50 citations). Nina Ghosh has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Haissam Haddad, Chi-Ming Chow, Paul Dorian, Raymond Yee, Andrew D. Krahn, George J. Klein, Allan C. Skanes, Christine Derzko, Adriana Luk and Marie Gerhard‐Herman. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, American Heart Journal and American Journal of Neuroradiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.