Dana G. Schabo
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Nina FarwigJörg AlbrechtBogdan JaroszewiczH. Martin SchaeferJonas HaggeRoland BrandlAlberto García‐RodríguezNuria Selva
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (18 papers)Plant and animal studies (11 papers)Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers)
- Cited by
- Nature and Landscape ConservationEcological ModelingEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Ecology
In The Last Decade
Dana G. Schabo
28 papers receiving 315 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 183
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 179
- Ecology 172
- Ecological Modeling 61
- Plant Science 59
Countries citing papers authored by Dana G. Schabo
This map shows the geographic impact of Dana G. Schabo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana G. Schabo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana G. Schabo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dana G. Schabo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana G. Schabo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana G. Schabo. The network helps show where Dana G. Schabo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana G. Schabo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana G. Schabo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana G. Schabo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana G. Schabo. Dana G. Schabo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Dana G. Schabo
Dana G. Schabo is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (18 papers), Plant and animal studies (11 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (179 citations), Ecological Modeling (61 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (183 citations). Dana G. Schabo has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Poland and Ethiopia. Frequent co-authors include Nina Farwig, Jörg Albrecht, Bogdan Jaroszewicz, H. Martin Schaefer, Jonas Hagge, Roland Brandl, Alberto García‐Rodríguez, Nuria Selva, Sascha Rösner and Roman Bucher. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.