Nina Caspersen

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
29 papers, 686 citations indexed

About

Nina Caspersen is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Cultural Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Nina Caspersen has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 686 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 20 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Cultural Studies. Recurrent topics in Nina Caspersen's work include Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (16 papers), Cyprus History, Politics, Society (9 papers) and Balkans: History, Politics, Society (8 papers). Nina Caspersen is often cited by papers focused on Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (16 papers), Cyprus History, Politics, Society (9 papers) and Balkans: History, Politics, Society (8 papers). Nina Caspersen collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Nina Caspersen's co-authors include Gareth Stansfield, Pål Kolstø, Lee J. M. Seymour, Yanina Welp, Stef Jansen, Rodrigo Moreno‐Serra and Rebecca Bryant and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Geoforum and Journal of Peace Research.

In The Last Decade

Nina Caspersen

27 papers receiving 586 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Unrecognized States in the International System

2012 192 citations Nina Caspersen, Gareth Stansfield Journal of Bioresource Management profile →

Peers

Nina Caspersen

PSIR

SPS

GHP

EE

CS

Helge Blakkisrud Norway

Gareth Stansfield United Kingdom

Steven D. Roper United States

Steven L. Burg United States

Gëzim Visoka Ireland

Toby Dodge United Kingdom

Roy Allison United Kingdom

Rick Fawn United Kingdom

Alan J. Kuperman United States

Martin A. Schain United States

Helge Blakkisrud Norway

Nina Caspersen

417 ×0.7

PSIR

294 ×0.7

SPS

139 ×1.1

GHP

43 ×0.8

EE

8 ×0.2

CS

Citations per year, relative to Nina Caspersen Nina Caspersen (= 1×) peers Helge Blakkisrud

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Caspersen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Caspersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Caspersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Caspersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Caspersen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Caspersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Caspersen. The network helps show where Nina Caspersen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Caspersen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Caspersen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Caspersen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Caspersen. Nina Caspersen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Caspersen, Nina, et al.. (2024). ‘No longer what you used to be’: Renegotiating relations between de facto states and their patrons. European Journal of International Relations. 31(1). 178–202.

2.

Caspersen, Nina, et al.. (2024). Ripe for better post-war governance? The impact of the 2016 peace agreement on the reestablishment of health services in Colombia. Political Geography. 111. 103090–103090. 1 indexed citations

3.

Bryant, Rebecca, et al.. (2021). De facto states and the everyday paradoxes of non-recognition. History and Anthropology. 32(3). 404–415. 1 indexed citations

4.

Caspersen, Nina. (2019). The creation of new states through interim agreements: Ambiguous compromises, intra-communal divisions, and contested identities. International Political Science Review. 41(5). 667–680. 1 indexed citations

5.

Caspersen, Nina. (2019). Human rights in territorial peace agreements. Review of International Studies. 45(4). 527–549. 5 indexed citations

6.

Caspersen, Nina. (2018). Recognition, Status Quo or Reintegration: Engagement with de facto States. Ethnopolitics. 17(4). 373–389. 29 indexed citations

7.

Caspersen, Nina, et al.. (2017). The Catalan Independence referendum: An assessment of the process of self-determination. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich). 6 indexed citations

8.

Caspersen, Nina. (2017). Peace Agreements: Finding Solutions to Intra-state Conflicts. 12 indexed citations

9.

Caspersen, Nina. (2015). The Pursuit of International Recognition After Kosovo. Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations. 21(3). 393–412. 19 indexed citations

10.

Caspersen, Nina. (2012). Regimes and peace processes: Democratic (non)development in Armenia and Azerbaijan and its impact on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 45(1-2). 131–139. 8 indexed citations

11.

Caspersen, Nina & Gareth Stansfield. (2012). Unrecognized States in the International System. Journal of Bioresource Management. 192 indexed citations breakdown →

12.

Caspersen, Nina. (2010). CONTESTED NATIONALISM. Berghahn Books. 13 indexed citations

13.

Caspersen, Nina. (2010). Contested Nationalism: Serb Elite Rivalry in Croatia and Bosnia in the 1990s. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 23 indexed citations

14.

Caspersen, Nina. (2009). Playing the Recognition Game: External Actors and De Facto States. The International Spectator. 44(4). 47–60. 59 indexed citations

15.

Caspersen, Nina. (2008). Separatism and Democracy in the Caucasus. Survival. 50(4). 113–136. 40 indexed citations

16.

Caspersen, Nina. (2008). Intragroup Divisions in Ethnic Conflicts: From Popular Grievances to Power Struggles. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics. 14(2). 239–265. 13 indexed citations

17.

Caspersen, Nina. (2008). Between Puppets and Independent Actors: Kin-state Involvement in the Conflicts in Bosnia, Croatia and Nagorno Karabakh. Ethnopolitics. 7(4). 357–372. 21 indexed citations

18.

Caspersen, Nina. (2006). Contingent Nationalist Dominance: Intra-Serb Challenges to the Serb Democratic Party. Nationalities Papers. 34(1). 51–69. 8 indexed citations

19.

Caspersen, Nina. (2004). Good Fences Make Good Neighbours? A Comparison of Conflict-Regulation Strategies in Postwar Bosnia. Journal of Peace Research. 41(5). 569–588. 31 indexed citations

20.

Caspersen, Nina. (2003). The Thorny Issue of Ethnic Autonomy in Croatia: Serb Leaders and Proposals for Autonomy.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact