Nina Burkardt

497 citations
30 papers · 361 indexed · h-index 9

Nina Burkardt

25 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers

Nina Burkardt
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 103
  • Water Science and Technology 115
  • Global and Planetary Change 143
  • Ecology 120
  • Public Administration 14
Replace Daniel Baker with:
Daniel Baker United States
Andrew Wyatt United States
Anna Lukasiewicz Australia
Christian Stein Germany
Alexis Morgan Canada
D. Ohlson Canada
Alejandro E. Camacho United States
Jan Fliervoet Netherlands
Jason Alexandra Australia
Ryder W. Miller
Nina Burkardt relative to Daniel Baker United States Daniel Baker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Daniel Baker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Burkardt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Burkardt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Burkardt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Burkardt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Burkardt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Burkardt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Burkardt. The network helps show where Nina Burkardt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nina Burkardt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nina Burkardt Line = papers co-authored together Nina Burkardt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20232
2 20222
3 202127
4 202024
5 201834
6 20152
7 20129
8 20091
9
An exploration of Bureau of Reclamation approaches for managing conflict over diverging science
20080
10 20063
11 20066
12 200538
13 20013
14 20005
15 19987
16
Rules for Success in Environmental Negotiation
19951
17
Technical Understanding in Successful Environmental Negotiations
19941
18 19933
19 19933
20
Self and organizational efficacy of front-line managers in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
19901

About Nina Burkardt

Nina Burkardt is a scholar working on Public Administration, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Strategy and Management, having authored 30 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conflict Management and Negotiation (5 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (3 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (3 papers), Landslides and related hazards (3 papers), Forest Management and Policy (3 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (3 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (2 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (103 citations), Water Science and Technology (115 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (143 citations). Nina Burkardt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Berton L. Lamb, Dawn King, Jonathan G. Taylor, Ian Chisholm, Andrea Locke, HG Beecher, Clair B. Stalnaker, Christopher Estes, R.L. Jacobson and Tonya Haigh. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Environmental Management and Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026