Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene
2015246 citationsDonna Haraway, Noboru Ishikawa et al.Ethnosprofile →
Patchy Anthropocene: Landscape Structure, Multispecies History, and the Retooling of Anthropology
2019183 citationsAnna Tsing, Andrew S. Mathews et al.Current Anthropologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Nils Bubandt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nils Bubandt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nils Bubandt more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nils Bubandt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nils Bubandt. The network helps show where Nils Bubandt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nils Bubandt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nils Bubandt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nils Bubandt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nils Bubandt. Nils Bubandt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bubandt, Nils, et al.. (2023). Philosophy on fieldwork case studies in anthropological analysis.1 indexed citations
3.
Bubandt, Nils. (2023). Tidalectic Ethnography:Snorkeling the Coral Reefs of the Anthropocene.
4.
Bubandt, Nils, et al.. (2020). Swimming with Crocodiles:Nature is avenged by prehistoric animal.
5.
Tsing, Anna, Andrew S. Mathews, & Nils Bubandt. (2019). Patchy Anthropocene: Landscape Structure, Multispecies History, and the Retooling of Anthropology. Current Anthropology. 60(S20). S186–S197.183 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Bubandt, Nils. (2018). A Non-secular Anthropocene:Spirits, Specters and Other Nonhumans in a Time of Environmental Change.5 indexed citations
7.
Tsing, Anna, Heather Anne Swanson, Elaine Gan, & Nils Bubandt. (2017). Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet. The Sciences.236 indexed citations
8.
Tsing, Anna, et al.. (2017). Introduction: Haunted Landscapes of the Anthropocene.26 indexed citations
9.
Bubandt, Nils. (2017). Demokrasi, Korupsi, dan Makhluk Halus dalam Politik Indonesia Kontemporer.
10.
Bubandt, Nils. (2017). Haunted Geologies: Spirits, Stones, and the Necropolitics of the Anthropocene.6 indexed citations
Haraway, Donna, Noboru Ishikawa, Scott F. Gilbert, et al.. (2015). Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene. Ethnos. 81(3). 535–564.246 indexed citations breakdown →
Bubandt, Nils. (1999). Profile of a Modern Utopia: Timber Plantations as Exemplary Centres of Indonesian Modernity.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.